Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pplz are they any good im hoping to run 20psi with a high modded car

should i get one or get something else

please let me know

I like 'em

Easy to install

Stable boost

Simple to adjust via Commander

Adjust and log via Datalogit

No ricey blue screen

:O cheers :(

I like mine.

But, if you can handle the ricey screen (I would mount it invisibly under the dash or in the glovebox) I would have bought the AVC-R insted of the Boost kit.

Reason? I'd just like to be able to adjust the boost in first gear.

I know everyone, myself included, normally says "Adjust boost with right foot" but I can now see the merit of having adjustable boost according to speed.

Would be great, especially during drag racing testing, to be able to add 0.5 psi at a time to first gear to try to eliminate wheelspin.

my $0.22 cents

pplz are they any good im hoping to run 20psi with a high modded car

should i get one or get something else

please let me know

Hmm - let me be the first to set a cat amongst the pigeons

I don't like mine

I have a mildly modified R32 GTR (~300awkw) with PFC + EBC and in hind sight I wish I had spent the extra ca$h up front and gone for the TurboSmart eBoost

It ?may? be just my tune - but I find mine does NOT hold even boost once I hit the max boost setting. The boost line waves all over the place – IE it varies +/- 1psi across the rev range.

Again – I don't know if this is the EBC or not – but that's what I get :)

I've seen other dyno graphs that are as flat as a tack once they hit the max boost setting

I also find it VERY noisy, it rattles/chatters like the clappers. That ?may? also be due to the fact that mine is mounted high on the passenger side fire wall – which makes it very easy to hear from inside the cabin.

If nothing else – this will give you something to think about

that's my 2c worth :mellow:

(let the flames begin)

Hmm - let me be the first to set a cat amongst the pigeons

It ?may? be just my tune - but I find mine does NOT hold even boost once I hit the max boost setting. The boost line waves all over the place – IE it varies +/- 1psi across the rev range.

Again – I don't know if this is the EBC or not – but that's what I get :D

I also find it VERY noisy, it rattles/chatters like the clappers. That ?may? also be due to the fact that mine is mounted high on the passenger side fire wall – which makes it very easy to hear from inside the cabin.

To get stable boost you need to have reasonably short hoses to the actuator.

If your's is on the firewall its probably too far away.

If it is installed closer to the turbo(s) ie, the passenger side strut tower, it should control boost better.

(and be quieter)

Although I know nothing, I have spoken to a tuner who doesn't like th PFC add-on, he prefers the AVCR. His reasons were, (AVCR has ) stabler boost, easier to setup and tune, with option of ironing out spikes at specific rpm, more functions. Though it might have been worth a mention.

Great unit, its the same unit really, i was missing the PFC sensor kit so i bought the AVCR one as its the same. Basically its the same without the rice blue screen.

And mine keeps boost very well.

so - any other suggestions as to why my unit does not hold a steady boost ?

If you have a nice stable consistant wastegate then their good but if not use an EBC with its own MAP sensor.

The Boost Control Kit comes with a MAP sensor, the same MAP sensor as the AVCR.

The Boost Control Kit solenoid is the same solenoid as the AVCR.

I have spoken to a tuner who doesn't like th PFC add-on, he prefers the AVCR. His reasons were, (AVCR has ) stabler boost, easier to setup and tune, with option of ironing out spikes at specific rpm, more functions.

That would be a lazy tuner. I would say the tune on the engine is substandard or it has other issues causing the boost to fluctuate. Instead of fixing the real problem, he prefers to stick a band aid on it. Use the boost controller to cover up for other issues that really should be fixed.

Technically speaking, boost is load dependant, not RPM dependant, so making boost corrections based on rpm points is not correct. It might smooth out the boost curve on the dyno, where the load and gearing is exactly the same every time. In the real world, that is simply not the case, where boost is very much gearing and load dependant. For example, you could be applying a boost correction at 6,000 rpm in fourth gear that is simple wrong at 6,000 rpm in second gear.

Next time someone tells you that rpm boost correction is a good thing to have, ask them to explain how they get around the effect on boost of differing loads at the same rpm.

:D cheers :D

I am also curious. Would it be better to spend the $$ on the kit or buy say a Blitz Dual SBC Spec R which I have not found onje bad review for.

The Spec R is dual solenoid and everyone says that its the best controller out there.

I have read mixed reports about the AVCR and its reliability. This would then flow on to the boost kit since they use the same components.

How much boost are you running?

What turbo?

What is the wastegate spring pressure?

Maybe you are trying to bleed off a bunch of air. Could be remedied by a bigger wastegate spring....

R32 GTR with freash forged motor and R34 N1s - running (only) 1.2bar (18 psi). Using the std N1 actuators (waste gate spring ?)

The Boost Control Kit comes with a MAP sensor, the same MAP sensor as the AVCR.

The Boost Control Kit solenoid is the same solenoid as the AVCR.

That would be a lazy tuner. I would say the tune on the engine is substandard or it has other issues causing the boost to fluctuate. Instead of fixing the real problem, he prefers to stick a band aid on it. Use the boost controller to cover up for other issues that really should be fixed.

Technically speaking, boost is load dependant, not RPM dependant, so making boost corrections based on rpm points is not correct. It might smooth out the boost curve on the dyno, where the load and gearing is exactly the same every time. In the real world, that is simply not the case, where boost is very much gearing and load dependant. For example, you could be applying a boost correction at 6,000 rpm in fourth gear that is simple wrong at 6,000 rpm in second gear.

Next time someone tells you that rpm boost correction is a good thing to have, ask them to explain how they get around the effect on boost of differing loads at the same rpm.

:D cheers :D

i always doubted the avcr "gear boost" functionality, thanks for clearing up

I like mine.

But, if you can handle the ricey screen (I would mount it invisibly under the dash or in the glovebox) I would have bought the AVC-R insted of the Boost kit.

Reason? I'd just like to be able to adjust the boost in first gear.

I know everyone, myself included, normally says "Adjust boost with right foot" but I can now see the merit of having adjustable boost according to speed.

Would be great, especially during drag racing testing, to be able to add 0.5 psi at a time to first gear to try to eliminate wheelspin.

my $0.22 cents

Get some street R series tyres and then you wont have to worry about hi boost in lower gears.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...