Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now, this is the first engine i've pulled apart so sorry if this is a bit of a newb question.

Refer to pictures, I'm wondering if this carbon buildup on the valves and top of cylinder is normal? (piston surfaces are like this also) I remember helping my dad rebuild a motor years ago, and it was nowhere near this bad. I'm trying to diagnose a possible problem with this rb20det I bought (it apparently had a misfire, but they couldn't figure out what was wrong with it).

Anyway, is this sort of carbon buildup a bad thing? The spark plugs were in similar shape, isn't this ment to mean it was running fairly rich?

head1.jpg

head2.jpg

anyway. like i said i don't really have a clue, but i'd like to have a rough idea of what's going on before i drop it off at the engine builder.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/112769-carbon-deposits-on-head-normal/
Share on other sites

hmm the RB30E i just pulled apart was like that, and mad flakes of it on the pistons

my RB25DET was heaps cleaner when i had the head off that, same with the pistons.. pretty much just discolouration not a coating like that.

that engine wasnt DRIVEN like it should have been, carbon builds up when you drive like grandma and dont give the old girl a good flogging once in a while.

when i pulled my head off my block nary a spec of carbon in the head and only a thin coat on the pistons, went well and never had a problem before i blew it.

proly misfired due to the massive ammounts of carbon buildup, hot spots and dieseling occur.

Edited by carl h

I recently had 2 heads off an RB30e, one was on gas and perfectly clean, the other was rather dirty and on fuel, no where near as bad as that though.

Shall be interesting to see how the head on mine looks after almost 40,000km's. I drive it like a grandma 90% of the time.

Way to rich mixtures, nothing more, nothing less. (what caused the excessively rich mixtures would be the real question)

You can get upper cylinder lube/cleaner or carbon clean in a bottle you spray into the inlet manifold and it cleans the piston tops, valves etc, without having to remove the cylinder head.

Water also does a good job, but you have to be very careful, if you don't know what your doing as you can hydro lock it.

You don't want all the carbon in the combustion chamber at all as it can get rather thick in places and cause hot spots that glow and cause the engine to detonate.

You don't usually see modern engines in a state like that, because the ecu's control the injection so precisely.

But you get a backyard racer boys that fiddles with oxygen sensors, fuel pressure regs, injectors etc, without having a clue, you can get the above effect.

My guess would be a f**ked 02 sensor.

no way in hell a farked o2 sensor would do that, i didnt run an o2 on my car and had no problem with it.

im gonna guess perhaps bad gas and granny driving did that, but like i said eariler (and this applies to most if not all nissans) you have go give the girl a bit of a go once in a while to keep her happy.

intersting...

thanks for the replies, I don't know much about the dude who I bought the motor from, but i believe it was running an aftermarket turbo and higher than stock boost ~180-200kw or so from memory.

No idea if he granny drove it, I'll be curious to see what the head from the rb20det in my car looks like when i eventually blow it and have to change it, because i don't daily drive it, it's a dedicated drift car.

what would be the best course of action to reco the head?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...