Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They don't for long though......Nissan 3rd gear + high rpm quick shift = BANG

There are not too many 10 sec cars running stock boxes....Not in Australia anyway. Theo broke 13 boxes to get his 10.78.

UREADY sydney

Simon perth

Sean perth

jett sydney

they're just a few off the top of my head on SAU that have run 10's on standard gearbox, I didn't mean it would be a good idea to do it over a long period of time but if they don't plan on being andra teched for 10's, a one hit wonder with stock gb isn't to bad budget wise

Edited by SPY
Sorry, i meant the vband style clamp on the exhaust housing to the centre core.

Well, me personally.? I dont think the dyno justifiys anyone from buying anything BUT a T04Z now days.

Good luck

Well we have seen a few good T04Z setups of late, will be interesting to see the baby T88 and how it goes...as the forum hasnt seen one done properly yet.

Well we have seen a few good T04Z setups of late, will be interesting to see the baby T88 and how it goes...as the forum hasnt seen one done properly yet.

I was under the impression there is a few build ups that have been completed on this forum (using the T04Z?)

But anyhow, this would have that big rush of power as it comes on later and harder

Freak as in all or nothing?

Nice to drive around the streets as in off boost or do you always drive around the streets above 6000rpm?

The plenum looks like it makes it more laggy as the lack of midrange is bordering on a joke? BRING BACK THE JUN PLENUM

All up very nice for drags shame you wont run it as plenty of GTR's run 10's with stock gearbox

WOW, thats seems like a fairly aggresive post. Why? are you actually interested or just trying to put me down? I'll assume your just a passionate GTR owner with a genuine interest (some pics and specs of your car would be nice) and try to respond to your "queries"

Yes, nice to drive on the street. Sure its more laggy than the GTSS's but the extra power MORE than makes up for it. The thing scares me now, and thats the way I like it.

Comments from the guys at Croydon were that this was one of the best responding T88 setups they have had on the dyno (2.6l) Obviously the Hypertune manifold is working very well, as the response is very good for the size of turbo, and the power at this boost level is also very good. BRING BACK THE JUN PLENUM? Why? the hypertune one is cheaper, FLOWS MORE and I very much doubt has any measurable difference in lag. Whats more, it is Australian made, lighter and the runners are fully machined from billet (it should be more expensive!). I have had both (obviously) and am more than happy with my choice.

Nice for drags... Thank you :D I will run it but I am planning to get a stronger box and would rather wait. Plenty of GTR's have also broken boxes running 10's you know..... I figure that every broken stock box is another step away from buying something decent. I can't wait to race it again though, and might take it out anyway but try to go easy on it.

Hi all , I'm curious to know if anyone has thought of using the later type Garrett GT4088R or Precision Turbos GT4067R which is same but with the TO4Z's TO4R 67 compressor and housing . The turbines used in these GT40BBG's are 78 compressor trim so a little less laggy than the bush bearing versions 84T turbine . A fellow I speak to from Full Race Motorsports in the US is getting 850 odd Hp from a drag Honda so must work ok . The exhaust housings come in .85 .95 1.06 and I think 1.16 .

Cheers A .

could you share a bit of light on the setup of your own car as i don't see you contributing much to this forum.

I try to put up as much info as possible on the combinations used on the car, where as you try to say that since the car is not registerd in my name that i don't have say as to how the car runs or what works tith the car.

My father is standing besides me as I type and is questioning the relevence of who owns the car.

If you were a fan of the GT-SS set up i'm sure you will be impressed once we have finished with this new round of mods.

hey 600hp nice results mate, lookin good and dont worry about all the critics, if u go gt-ss's they say too small and then t88 too big, so whatever u do someone will wanna have a go at your setup. most of em just wish they had as much power as your engine.

good luck with it :)

Sounds like an absolute weapon!! Allot of money spent there.

Is the car everything that you wanted it to be! because thats all that matters.

When you get sick of the dyno/drag setup run a to4z or the like,and take it to the circuit!

Im drueling allready.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The prices I’ve heard aren’t that bad 
    • Oh, I also meant to say that it is possible to use a venting BOV and restrict its outlet down so that it does vent enough to prevent the sututu, but vents slowly enough that the AFM doesn't see all the air at once and makes it easier to avoid stalling.
    • I'll go talk to my bank manager. Either that or my nearest western Sydney drug baron.
    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
×
×
  • Create New...