Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi People

I have a high mount turbo setup (complete) it includes NEW High mount manifold, t3/t4 xs power turbo .5 front A/R and .63 rear A/R rated at 500hp with lines and flange (redone by Rotormaster new bearing and balanced 4 months ago) and a imitation tial wastegate. All components are in perfect working condition making 241rwkw on an rb20. The turbo and waste gate have been on my car for a total of four months so they are in great condition

The reason for sale is that it was a touch too lagy on the good old rb20 full boost kicked in a touch over 4500rpm and i got sent out two manifolds instead on one.

This is how the manifold looks on an rb20 Same brand manifold (sorry grim32 for stealing the pics hope you don't mind)

post-21010-1141018652_thumb.jpg

And this is what it looks like with a turbo attatched

post-21010-1141019145_thumb.jpg

Here are pics of my setup i'm looking at $900 complete + postage if your outside melbourne and pickup is available. This price is cheap, cause to get the turbo redone cost me $400

P1010050.jpg

P1010049.jpg

P1010048.jpg

P1010047.jpg

P1010046.jpg

P1010045.jpg

P1010044.jpg

P1010043.jpg

Cheers

Anthony

Edited by black sky
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/116341-complete-turbo-setup-for-rb2025/
Share on other sites

Come on guys $900 is cheap for this setup and it makes good power. willing to take $850

Cheers

Anthony

I know jack all about NA engines but a mate of mine has a R34 NA. Suppose he bought this. what else would he need to complete a NA to Turbo conversion?

I know jack all about NA engines but a mate of mine has a R34 NA. Suppose he bought this. what else would he need to complete a NA to Turbo conversion?

Well to make good power what you would have to do is change fuel pump and also injectors depending on what cc they are, change head gasket and get a re map for your computer everything else is fine. Dr drift has made +250 rwkw on na motors with just a bolt on turbo, fuel and headgasket.

Cheers

anthony

Edited by black sky

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...