Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, I am relatively new to the Skyline & turbo scene (usually found playing with V8 Commodores) - but I have just bought a nice black R33 GTS-T - 1996 model. I just a couple of qustions about them:

1. How much boost does a GTS-T run standard? I don't have a boost guage so I am wondering if anyone knows off-hand.

2. How much boost is a good, safe level to increase to - maybe 12psi?

3. In the next few weeks I am looking at adding FMIC, maybe a bit more boost, and do a dyno tune. The car already has 3" turbo back exhaust & HKS pod-filter. I am hoping for around 180-200rwkw, what else do I need to do?

Thanks guys, I will post up some pics when I pick the car up next week.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/116685-just-bought-r33-gts-t/
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Skyline world!

Standard boost is 7psi but I am told it is safe to run 12-13 with standard intercooler.

The output after the mods depends on the tuner, if the person knows what he is going then your output should be good on the dyno. I goto a guy in Granville Sydney.

I am going to get a few things done to mine soon. Turbo back exhaust(dump pipe) with High flow cat and a boost controller. I will run all this with standard air intake and intercooler. It won't cost me an arm and a leg but should get me up to 180rwkws.

Edited by harryg

You do have a boost guage - check the instrument cluster! It's in mm/Hg - not the standard psi or bar but it is an accurate boost guage.

You probably don't need anything else except for the FMIC and increase of boost to get 180rwkw.

Cool, so 180-200rwkw is achievable on 12psi with exhaust, intercooler and tune (assuming the tuner knows what they are doing)? Sounds good to me.

You do have a boost guage - check the instrument cluster! It's in mm/Hg - not the standard psi or bar but it is an accurate boost guage.

You probably don't need anything else except for the FMIC and increase of boost to get 180rwkw.

I didn't notice the boost guage on the instrument cluster, I will have a look when I pick the car up. I have a unit converter to work out the psi figure.

Thanks guys.

Edited by Quinny
10-11 you can sleep soundly at night

11-12 keeps you awake at night

12+ go to sleep knowing the fact that your turbo does not have long to live anyway

my 2c

OK, so 10 psi is a better idea, no worries. I am not as concerned about performance as I am worried about reliability. I don't want to do anything to jeopardise the reliability of the engine.

OK, so 10 psi is a better idea, no worries. I am not as concerned about performance as I am worried about reliability. I don't want to do anything to jeopardise the reliability of the engine.

if you want 200rwkw

you will need: apexi pfc, a decent pod filter with cai, full exhaust, ex cam gear, fmic, and i duno.. 12psi and maybe a fuel pump?

dont run the turbo over 1 bar of boost "14.7psi" as the wheels are ceramic and will most likely come off and fly down your exhaust as mine did...

thats just stupid..

Ok, so it looks like I need a little more work for 200rwkw. As I said, I am more concerned with reliablity than performance, so I don't want to go too stupid.

What sort of power would you expect from 3" exhaust, filter, FMIC, 10psi, dyno tuned on standard turbo and computer?

I run 12psi but have ECU, Fmic, fuel pump and regulator plus your mods and with a good tune has 210kws, the fuel pump was my last upgrade as the standard one just didnt cut it, I haven't got after market cams and was told I wont really need them below 240kw, I know my turbo may die at this level but with careful use it has lasted 1 1/2 yrs now.

hey, i run mine on 10psi and have had no trouble, with 10psi, frontmount and no tuning i got 177kw at the wheels, so there is a good indication for ya

That is what I like to hear. I want to avoid spending too much money on the car, I have spent way too much money on cars in the last couple of years. I want to try to get the best gains I can with the basic bolt-on mods. I don't want to go to the trouble of changing the turbo, internals, upgrade the fuel system etc, I just want the best gains I can get for a basically "standard" car.

Would I be better off spending my money on a good intercooler or a Power FC computer and dyno tune? Which would give better gains for the money for a basically stock engine (10psi, exhaust & filter)?

I will be getting both at some stage, but which would be better to get first?

Edited by Quinny

FMIC by itself doesn't do anything for extra performance. It allows you to run higher boost pressure. It is also a safety-net sort of part as FMIC will make your car run better on hot days.

PowerFC will let you control air/fuel/ignition etc.

Most people will get the FMIC first but if you don't want to increase boost pressure you may want to get the PowerFC first - this will allow you to do changes like run better AFRs which will make your car perform better as well as conserve fuel in the top end.

Thanks mate, I might let a dyno run decide what to do next, if everything looks ok, then I think I will bump the boost up to 10psi, and add the FMIC, then get the computer a little later. If the tune looks out when the dyno run is done, I will get the computer and re-tune. Thanks guys. Sorry for all the questions, I am new at this....

I have just started putting a new website together still in progress but I have uploaded a R33 tuning guide which will help you and others. Read this guide and let me know what you think.R33 Tuning Guide

Cheers

PS: Please excuse the spelling :P

Edited by Munna1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...