Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi i got a Auto r33 gtst i have been tossing up wat to get.. It is either APEXI-S-AFC2 or a Greddy E-manage.. I want about 220kw-240kw atw eventually. I just dont know wat to get, can everyone give me some insite into this issue.. i just bought my r33 and recently had a wrx so my knowledge of r33 mods are minimal..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117086-r33-ecu-decision/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello

if you want a replacement ECU i can supply a HYDRA EMS which is a straight plug in and Controls the Auto box features.The ECU gets rid of the AIR FLOW METER and runs A 3 BAR MAP SENSOR which will give you a better tune. It also allows you to change the type of coils you run EG falcon Coils.

$1500 with a Base map

Hello

if you want a replacement ECU i can supply a HYDRA EMS which is a straight plug in and Controls the Auto box features.The ECU gets rid of the AIR FLOW METER and runs A 3 BAR MAP SENSOR which will give you a better tune. It also allows you to change the type of coils you run EG falcon Coils.

$1500 with a Base map

So it actually controls the auto or does it just render it into complete limp home mode aka wolf3d.

how does a map sensor give you a better tune? its less accurate.

also curios does it actaully interact with the autobox or is it like the other ecu's and just assumes manual and doesnt cut timing on gearchanges.

i would go with apexi safc, apexi sitc and that should give you all you need. that power level should be easy with those piggybacks and it will be cheaper and more useful than the emanage

No AIR FLOW METER ECU Gives you an accurate TUNE

i aint starting this argument AGAIN

How can you state it doesnt give you an accurate tune you musnt have any knowledge behind tuning

and the ECU fully controls the Gearbox . It has its own Gearbox AUX to control Pressures and other Custom settings. When the ecu is installed into the car the ECU comes with a base tune which has this function controling it.

the best and more accurate way to measure the amount of air coming into the engine is via a hotwire airflow meter. the map sensor method guesses the mount of air in the system by working out a given pressure and doing a mathematical guess on how much is likely to be present.

ie: once you hit target boost the amount of "air" present never increase

even though more air is coming into the system

with an airflow meter system the amount of air coming into the system is always increasing, despite being on target boost in the manifold.

so please explain how a map sensor is more accurate

No AIR FLOW METER ECU Gives you an accurate TUNE

i aint starting this argument AGAIN

How can you state it doesnt give you an accurate tune you musnt have any knowledge behind tuning

and the ECU fully controls the Gearbox . It has its own Gearbox AUX to control Pressures and other Custom settings. When the ecu is installed into the car the ECU comes with a base tune which has this function controling it.

So you can command the shift solenoids as well? TPS vs VSS shifting like most OEM manufacturers I presume? Can you give us so more info cause that sounds too good to be true.

An airflow meter is not actually reading "air" either.. it's measuring the change in heat to the afm element cooled by the amount of "air" flowing through the "hotwire".. again, it pretty much uses calculations to work out the amount of air going in. They're too different methods to do essentially the same thing and each has pros and cons.

i understand where your comming from

i aint starting an argument again i think more people should do research into MAP sensors and get out of the Air flow meter ECUS

1 majour bad thing about the Air flow meter is that it restricts air flow

the second in big injected and turbod cars have problems idleing with Air flow meters while with Map sensors you can adjust the map to suit and fine adjust it to give you stable idling

personally i have researched into ecus and have found the map sensor is much more reliable and accurate

giving you no restrictions

Edited by MR331307

so far there are only certain cars which this ecu works on

and currently the Skyline

GTR GTS is one that is proven

yes it adjusteds shift points,Stalls and any other Gearbox auxs needed. i know i have tried it and carnt believe it works myself thats why i recommend this ecu to everyone. Its one of the best on the market.

i think the designer must of designed it Specially for SKYLINES

lol

how does a map sensor give you a better tune? its less accurate.

also curios does it actaully interact with the autobox or is it like the other ecu's and just assumes manual and doesnt cut timing on gearchanges.

i would go with apexi safc, apexi sitc and that should give you all you need. that power level should be easy with those piggybacks and it will be cheaper and more useful than the emanage

yeh i was kinda goin towards the apexi safc, but does the e-manage have more features. I aint worried about the price but seriously wat is the best between the two..... I have never heard of a HYDRA EMS . Are they very reliable??

the best and more accurate way to measure the amount of air coming into the engine is via a hotwire airflow meter. the map sensor method guesses the mount of air in the system by working out a given pressure and doing a mathematical guess on how much is likely to be present.

ie: once you hit target boost the amount of "air" present never increase

even though more air is coming into the system

with an airflow meter system the amount of air coming into the system is always increasing, despite being on target boost in the manifold.

so please explain how a map sensor is more accurate

As long as you can calculate the mass of the air charge ie manifold pressure and temp, both systems will be equally accurate in steady state systems. However the majority of cars life is spent accelerating and decellerating hence it is a very dynamic system. This is why MAF based ECU's can provide a more consitent tune as there is a delay in pressure drop with respect to throttle postion. This is mhy most map based system rely hevily on tps based enrichments.

I'm neither for nor agianst either. But I can tell you for sure that it is alot easier to get a result drivability wise using a MAF based system then it is with a MAP.

you can certainly run airflow meters on large powered system, just get more, scale is sideways instead of up and down and you wont have an issue. if its a restrict fit a larger sized unit, or another unit.

map sensor will always be second rate

the emage can be bought with aditional harnesses, such as ignition and injector harnesses. one of the big things against it is that there are fewer people who can tune it. if money isn't that much of an issue go a power FC... unless they are no good for auto's. someone please confirm or correct me on this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...