Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone broken their remote rear seat handle in the boot ? seems pretty fragile for the force required to pull the cable and release the seat. Also, realised today that the rear seat can be laid back for extra comfort, using the handle next to the seat. thought that the rear seats were a little too upright.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117693-remote-rear-seat-lever/
Share on other sites

Mines not broke, but then I dont get to use them often with 3 baby seats and all. If you have to pull harder then one finger then you got a seized cable or locking mechanism problem.

Yes, reclining rear seats are just another sweet Stagea touch, designed by someone who actually thought about what might be useful.

Now that you've broken it - what's it made of - plastic or metal?

Edited by 3intheBack

Mine dont need much force at all to get them to work.... Also my kids found the recliner lever and now proceede to change it constantly to match their mood I guess.

I guess they copy me as first thing I do when I get in is seatbelt, then make tiny adjustments to mirrors and seat and then start her up.

I broke one of mine ;) cost $68 for a new one from Nissan.

That's not too bad seeing this on yahoo japan.

Around $50AUD purchase price only.

I have a feeling you may have paid $68 for the plastic handle only though...

Edited by munchdesign
That's not too bad seeing this on yahoo japan.

Around $50AUD purchase price only.

I have a feeling you may have paid $68 for the plastic handle only though...

Nope, it came complete, handle, bracket and cable :(

  • 2 months later...

Well my passengers side lever went this morning, went to drop the rear seat, didnt yank on it or anything, and snap.......

So what is the part number, for the passengers side one, I'm guessing the drivers side and passengers side will have different part numbers?

hey cyrus dont u reckon a dedicated sticky thread with stagea part numbers for parts us members buy would make it very easy and handy for others when it comes to ordering bits and pieces. im talking all parts like manual console surrounds, to these handles, and cargo covers, and anything inside or outside the stagea :miner: virtually a nissan fast part no. thread to save the nissan dealers from trying to find part no's on the Fast programs.

good or bad idea? :rofl:

cheers

Brad

hey cyrus dont u reckon a dedicated sticky thread with stagea part numbers for parts us members buy would make it very easy and handy for others when it comes to ordering bits and pieces. im talking all parts like manual console surrounds, to these handles, and cargo covers, and anything inside or outside the stagea :miner: virtually a nissan fast part no. thread to save the nissan dealers from trying to find part no's on the Fast programs.

good or bad idea? :rofl:

cheers

Brad

i think its a great idea save the screwing around and stuff

hey cyrus dont u reckon a dedicated sticky thread with stagea part numbers for parts us members buy would make it very easy and handy for others when it comes to ordering bits and pieces. im talking all parts like manual console surrounds, to these handles, and cargo covers, and anything inside or outside the stagea :P virtually a nissan fast part no. thread to save the nissan dealers from trying to find part no's on the Fast programs.

good or bad idea? :D

cheers

Brad

Already done, there is a parts list, the link is in the sticky mega link thread :)

Here ya go Ska, have replaced the same one in mine, cost bout $69, bit of work involved too, have to remove the complete rear left interior trim to get to it.

88925-0V015

Yes well I had to have a fiddle didnt I :angry:

Well after 4hours of unscrewing and removing bits and pieces I found out why my ATESA isnt working right, one of the wires had worn through and was shorting out on the body, so whacked a bit of electrical tape around it and zippy tied it away from where it had worn through.

Anyway, I followed the line through and near the release mechanisim on the seat itself there is a white bit of plastic which sits around the cable and then slots into the unlocking mechanisim, one side of it had broken off, the plastic was a bit detiriorated, so I whacked a bit of superglue on it and let it dry, hey presto, works like a charm :P

Then it only took about 2hours to get it all back in, :D What an adventure :)

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...