Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alrite then. What ill get done is: Rebuild Callipers, rebuild master cylinder, check brake booster, DBA 4000 slotted rotors front & rear, Ferodo DS2500 pads front, Racebrakes Rb74 pads rear.

Well will your suspension kits suffice for what I need? If not what would be more suitable? Maybe we should talk via PM SK?

Thanks a lot guys, I appreciate your help and advice and so does everyone else :thumbsup:

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Alrite then. What ill get done is: Rebuild Callipers, rebuild master cylinder, check brake booster, DBA 4000 slotted rotors front & rear, Ferodo DS2500 pads front, Racebrakes Rb74 pads rear.

Well will your suspension kits suffice for what I need? If not what would be more suitable? Maybe we should talk via PM SK?

Thanks a lot guys, I appreciate your help and advice and so does everyone else :thumbsup:

You forgot braided lines. Also, I think you will find the friction coefficient for RB74's to be lower than that for DS2500. This will affect your brake balance - and not in a good way. Just get some DS2500 rears as well. Lastly, if the rear rotors on your car are in good nick you needn't replace them. The back end doesn't do alot of work, so you can save yourself $400.

From using one of the Whiteline suspension kits for the R32 GT-R I can assure you they are streets ahead of the standard stuff & much better than a great deal of the imported gear. Also the price is very good.

But he is going to have an RB30 bottom end with RB26 head running GT-RS. He will be arriving at corners very quick...and the car is heavy.

I for one cant see a std weight R32 GTR with 296mm x 30mm rotors stopping consistantly on a race track with semi slicks and 450 odd rwkws.

...and you may have to play with front to rear pad compunds to find what works best. Again i suggest you will need way more brake pad then either DS2500s or RB74s. And typically i dont believe its the norm to be running the same pads front to rear.

Id you are goign to give it a go with DBA and std sized gear i would be lookign at race pads, more then street pads that go ok on the track

Can you get the DBA 5000 rotors?

Im thinking this track as then you just change the actual rotor, not the whole thing, you keep your hat. That way it SHOULD be cheaper to get new rotors, and you can go for a more aggresive pad without having to worry about the cost of rotors as much. That or you can go a custom rotor (as its easier to machine) which might be better.

Dont actually do it without some professional advice, Im simply putting forward the idea.

I guess what i'll have to do is get the dba's and try different pads, and see which one is the best combination, and if i'm not all that satisfied i can then go to aftermarket callipers and larger rotors.

Dan's having a look into it for me.

What high quality suspension is there other than that of the whiteline & bilstein?

I guess what i'll have to do is get the dba's and try different pads, and see which one is the best combination, and if i'm not all that satisfied i can then go to aftermarket callipers and larger rotors.

Dan's having a look into it for me.

What high quality suspension is there other than that of the whiteline & bilstein?

We use Proflex double adjustable shocks from Murray Coote and Eibach springs in the race GTR's, around $2K per corner. With a few sets of springs with different rates. Plus Whiteline adj stabiliser bars and bushes.

For a bit less you could try DMS from Jamie Drummond. But don't fiddle around with the 40 mm, single adjustable shock, go straight to the 50 mm double adjustable.

As Roy said, weight is your enemy in a GTR, stuff like a full titanium exhaust is a must for serious circuit work. And make sure you get the lightest wheels your budget can afford, they are 4 big flywheels. Take ~150 kgs out of it and brakes aren't such a big issue anymore.

:) cheers :blink:

PS; like 75% of the Production Car field, we use Hawk pads.

Edited by Sydneykid
But he is going to have an RB30 bottom end with RB26 head running GT-RS. He will be arriving at corners very quick...and the car is heavy.

I for one cant see a std weight R32 GTR with 296mm x 30mm rotors stopping consistantly on a race track with semi slicks and 450 odd rwkws.

...and you may have to play with front to rear pad compunds to find what works best. Again i suggest you will need way more brake pad then either DS2500s or RB74s. And typically i dont believe its the norm to be running the same pads front to rear.

Id you are goign to give it a go with DBA and std sized gear i would be lookign at race pads, more then street pads that go ok on the track

Fair enough, Roy. Obviously you are privy to some information that I don't have.

As far as front/rear balance is concerned from the published numbers I have seen for pad friction coefficients the RB74 is lower than the DS2500. So if you want to move the brake bias forward then run a higher coefficient pad on the front. My local (ie WA) brake vendor has been recommending DS2500 all round when using that particular pad. Presently I have different pads front/rear but am about to install DS2500s all round.

As an aside I don't think that DBA do a 5000 series for either an R32 or an R33. Certainly their catalogue doesn't list one, but I may be wrong on that.

Lastly the brake package & pad selection for the car may well depend on the event entered. What you want in a brake pad for a hill climb will be vastly different to that when wanting to do 30+ laps of Queensland Raceway in one hit. I guess I was focusing more on the hill climb/sprint event/road registered aspect of the whole thing & yourself on the 700hp track car. :thumbsup:

- CSC look good value for what they are - engineer is ex-Harrop. One of the boys on here is running front and rear CSC kit, can't remember who.

Yep, that's me.

I have the 355mm fronts and 343 rears. The only reason Harrop's etc are better is because the rotor life is longer. But the rotors themselves are twice the price. Value for money you cannot go past them.

Regards

Andrew

Edited by BBGTR
I’m currently putting together my engine specs as my engine let go on the weekend. It will be an rb26/30, Garrett gtrs’s and supporting gear for 700engineHP (I have an excel spreadsheet if anyone is interested in having a look and making some suggestions).

:D

QLR seems to have a few big stops looking at it on TV. But then the SAU-QLD boys seem to be rarely let loose on the full circuit...i know if i had a car that was only going to be driven in NSW then the brakes i need on a car are a lot less then if the car was going to be driven at Vic tracks.

Either way, i would be doing the brakes after your engine, suspension and coolign mods...you will have a much better idea of how much more you need

Yep, that's me.

I have the 355mm fronts and 343 rears. The only Harrop's etc are better is because the rotor life is longer. But the rotors themselves are twice the price. Value for money you cannot go past them.

Regards

Andrew

Can i ask how much you paid for them?

I gave GSA Wholesale Suspension a ring this morning regarding the DMS suspension, they said they can do it for $4340 fitted and aligned, any good?

Thats the plan roy. Engine (rb30 bottom end, whack forgies in so i dont have to take the head off again), get the suspension bits, get the DBA's & reco the callipers and complete the cooling side before i hit the track. Then i can think about pumping some more power into her.

Thanks alor for all your help guys. I'm sure i'll make a trip down to NSW and have a run around the tracks down there, look forward to meeting up with u guys :D

cheers

Shane

Thats the plan roy. Engine (rb30 bottom end, whack forgies in so i dont have to take the head off again

Standard RB30 conrods and bolts = not a good idea

They are about as good as the standard pistons

:P cheers :D

Yeah I know that, I’ve planned to put rods in there aswell, just couldn’t be bothered writing it all out.

I’ll add the spreadsheet in here aswell for you guys to have a look at.

I'll just go with the dba's and pads for now, if i do change my mind i'll get onto you thoug :).

Well i've had a look at what HAWK have to offer, and this is what i've come up with:

Front:

HT 14

149-871 degrees

Very high torque with aggressive initial bite. Excellent modulation and release

characteristics. Brake pads designed for cars with extremely high deceleration rates and

down force.

Rear:

HT 10

149-871 degrees

Intermediate to high torque with a smooth initial bite. Very consistent pedal feel. Excellent modulation and release characteristics.

My reasons for picking these are that they have a reasonably good low temp range (149deg) and also a fairly high temp range (871deg). The lowest they offer is 38-482, or 121-538degrees and i believe the ones i have chosen are a good compromise in both regards but still offer a wide temp range. Making them ideal for sprint events & hillclimbs where you wont be able to get alot of temperature into them, but still offer a high temp rating which will be good for the big brake stops on certain circuits.

Also the fact the front pads have a more aggressive initial bite than the rears, as this would be ideal so when under hard braking the ass will stay in control and offer some brake bias.

Is this correct? or should i go for some other type of pads?

cheers

Shane

I'll just go with the dba's and pads for now, if i do change my mind i'll get onto you thoug :).

Well i've had a look at what HAWK have to offer, and this is what i've come up with:

Front:

HT 14

149-871 degrees

Very high torque with aggressive initial bite. Excellent modulation and release

characteristics. Brake pads designed for cars with extremely high deceleration rates and

down force.

Rear:

HT 10

149-871 degrees

Intermediate to high torque with a smooth initial bite. Very consistent pedal feel. Excellent modulation and release characteristics.

My reasons for picking these are that they have a reasonably good low temp range (149deg) and also a fairly high temp range (871deg). The lowest they offer is 38-482, or 121-538degrees and i believe the ones i have chosen are a good compromise in both regards but still offer a wide temp range. Making them ideal for sprint events & hillclimbs where you wont be able to get alot of temperature into them, but still offer a high temp rating which will be good for the big brake stops on certain circuits.

Also the fact the front pads have a more aggressive initial bite than the rears, as this would be ideal so when under hard braking the ass will stay in control and offer some brake bias.

Is this correct? or should i go for some other type of pads?

cheers

Shane

The HT-10's and 14's will not get to temp quick enough from my experience.

A good set up is Hawk Blues (9012 compound) for the front and Hawk HPS for the back.

Alternative for the front are Ferodo DS3000's, they are nearly as good as the Blues however don't last as long.

Regards

Andrew

I'm keen to go out on a limb and try them out...

By not coming up to temp quick enough, how much does it take, and how much performance is there before they get up to temp? I mean will they give better results than that of the ds2500's or similar?

Most of our drivers are trained to trail brake, so we use HT10's front and rear. You won't find any problem getting them up to temperature in a lap dash/super sprint environment. In half a lap warm up we see well over 300 degrees at the rotor (we have infrared temp measurement).

For hillclimbs I use the brakes agressively down the return road and while queing. Even on a cold day I can 200+ degrees, which is more than enough for the 1 or 2 uphill brake applications I make.

:D cheers :D

Ps; you are hardly "going out on a limb" using Hawk pads, pop out to a NSW State level race meeting and I will introduce you to 100 or so guys using them.

Edited by Sydneykid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...