Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I haven’t been interstate racing with the GTR’s, but Sandown certainly was no harder on brakes with the RX7. It runs very high brake temps at 2 spots on the circuit at Sandown but Oran Park has 3 very high spots and Eastern Creek has 2 highs and 2 very highs. Oran Park is the highest brake wear circuit.

You can certainly see the brake temps drop as you increase the corner speed. I really believe that’s the secret. You only have to look at the lap times, there are 600+bhp highly modified Skylines that are 5 seconds a lap slower than the Production GTR. It isn’t straight line speed, it’s all in the corners. That means the brakes work harder to get the higher straightline terminal speed down to the lower cornering speed.

The bottom line, as I always say, spend the $6K on suspension and driving lessons. You will do a faster lap time than spending the same $6K on brakes.

:( cheers :woot:

PS; the High Energy sump currently in the sig. is the best off the shelf solution I have found for a 2wd. Obviously they won’t fit a 4wd, the Performance Metalcraft sump is the best for them.

Ok so is this a definition thing? Do you feel that brake wear is associated with brake fade. I know high temps are. Im just basing my comments on the average hack steering a car and what I have noticed with my car. At Wakefiled I could seriously do a 30 min session, backing off for a lap every 4 or 5 to let the tyres and engine cool without any brake problems. The old Motoconcpet days at EC had me doing 20min sessions (or was it 15mins?) without any drama whatsoever with brakes. I find Sandown and Calder a bit harder on brakes in my car. I feel I still have enough capacity in my current setup, but with me arriving at corners 20km/h quicker Im thinking that my new budget brake upgrade will be a nice to have.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok so is this a definition thing? Do you feel that brake wear is associated with brake fade. I know high temps are. Im just basing my comments on the average hack steering a car and what I have noticed with my car. At Wakefiled I could seriously do a 30 min session, backing off for a lap every 4 or 5 to let the tyres and engine cool without any brake problems. The old Motoconcpet days at EC had me doing 20min sessions (or was it 15mins?) without any drama whatsoever with brakes. I find Sandown and Calder a bit harder on brakes in my car. I feel I still have enough capacity in my current setup, but with me arriving at corners 20km/h quicker Im thinking that my new budget brake upgrade will be a nice to have.

That's a good question, what exactly does "harder on brakes" really mean?

Highest temperature reached? (Sandown, Dandenong road)

Wear rate? (Oran Park)

Fastest temperature rise? (Eastern Creek, turn 2)

Longest sustained temperature? (Winton, around the shoe box)

Highest ambient temperature effect on braking performance? (Darwin, Humidity Valley)

Most crap in the brake ducts making them overheat? (Wanneroo, the sand pit)

Add them all together and I reckon it's Surfers Paradise, that is one mean mother of braking circuit. One lap in a Production car = warped disks, boiled brake fluid and cracked pads.

:( cheers :woot:

Me? Nope. But have spoken to a few of the WRX guys and a Commodore guy that runs them. He has 320rwkws in his HSV and the thing would weigh about, what 1750kg? So if he is happy.

I did have them all trial fitted to my car...i decided to do my own setup which is what you saw sitting on the loungeroom floor :(

mmmm 'tis a nice kit!!

btw I think I left that dremel at your place, oops

Greg: Yeah, will do man, I really wouldn't mind trying them. But I'm hoping that this budget upgrade (same as SK is running) will do the job for me, possibly along with the 303mm rear disc upgrade along the same lines.

Oh yep, I saw that a while ago, has a picture of a single piston sliding calliper. It’s not a big rotor diameter upgrade for an R32GTST, going from 297 to 303 mm. Much more impressive for an S13, being 258 to 303 mm. I don’t think 6 mm is worth it, plus I am not sure that the calliper adaptor will even fit.

:wave: cheers :)

Yeah, probably not worth it on a 32, but I have a 180sx with 32 front brakes (most likely going to the 324mm conversion kit for them), and stock rears, which are pathetic at 258mm.

What makes you think it wouldn't fit out of curiosity??

Dane

Yeah, probably not worth it on a 32, but I have a 180sx with 32 front brakes (most likely going to the 324mm conversion kit for them), and stock rears, which are pathetic at 258mm.

What makes you think it wouldn't fit out of curiosity??

Dane

The adaptor is obviously designed to move the calliper out 45mm (258 mm to 303mm). But the GTST M calliper would only have to be moved out 6 mm (297 mm to 303 mm). Since the bolts are 8mm (from memory) I don’t see how you could move the calliper only 6 mm. No room to fit the bolts.

I'm doing a 322mm rear upgrade for std GTR brembos...

it's a work-in-progress...

For the same reason, I also suspect that 22 mm (300 mm to 322 mm) would be rather tricky as 2 X 8 mm for bolts doesn’t leave a lot of room for adaptor strength.

:D cheers :D

ahhhh I see, so there should be no worries with an S13, provided it is a sound design in the first place??

Correct

correct - it has to be an offset bracket

From memory that could be tricky, the upper control arm would stop the calliper from being moved upwards. And the handbrake cable would go close to getting in the way if the calliper was moved downwards. You have probably already looked at that I assume.

:D cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid
From memory that could be tricky, the upper control arm would stop the calliper from being moved upwards. And the handbrake cable would go close to getting in the way if the calliper was moved downwards. You have probably already looked at that I assume.

yes... /runs to garage/

to be continued

Sydneykid, off topic just wondering what times you guys were doing at Sandown and in what car/setup??

Cheers

From memory;

Improved Production RX7 = low 1.21's

Improved Production Civic = low 1.25's (lap record U2L)

V8 SuperCar Commondoor = low 1.11's

Haven't run the F3 there, Sandown isn't on the Australian Championship

Does 1.27's at Philip Island if that's any help

That's around 7 seconds faster than the Commondoor

So I reckon around 1.06's at Sandown

Would never run the Improved Production GTR there, the restrictors would kill it.

:D cheers :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...