Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Seeing as my next step is to install a FMIC on my R33 GTSt, I have been trying to research wether a FMIC would actually increase my cars current power output or not. Many sceptics say that a FMIC won’t increase any power but will only be a supporting modification to allow higher power output. Interestingly enough, I was looking into fitting a Hybrid GT spec kit and thought to share some of the claims Hybrid have made.

www.hybrid-power.com

Claims that with their Monster Bar & Plate Cooler kit for a skyline, have achieved a typical Gain: 25-30 rear wheel kilo watt (RWKW) with no other mods!

www.powerdigger.com

Claims:

MY01 Subaru WRX with the factory ECU boost controller gained 15aw/kw (40kw gain at engine)

Holden Calais VL Turbo gained 50rw/kw in the mid range of about 3250rpm with only 12 psi of boost.

Ford BA XR6T gained a massive 17% power of 30kw (about 50kw power gain at the engine) with standard boost.

Please visit the Hybrid websites to view their full claim along with dyno results.

Would anyone like to comment on these claims? Im intrested to see what your opinions are on this issue.

Regards,

Sarkis

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118197-intercooler-myth-or-fact/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats excellent Ben!! so considering my car is 165rw/kw at the moment, I should be hoping to see 180 - 185rwkw after the FMIC? then with cold air intake and 12psi i should see nearly 190rw/kw? Im wondering where all those sceptics are? hahha

Cheers

mm but larger pipes = slower airflow (although allowances for more), on a rb20 few people with stock coolers claim increases. If your turbo is capable of more and your intercoolers restricting the flow then yeh itll be a increase with a better cooler but if your coolers big enough already then putting a bigger one on could drop flow

my 2 cents

I have the Hybrid GT kit and was dynoed at 166rwkw before the cooler and made 208rwkw after the cooler...

Disclaimer: different dynoes on different days so comparing results would be a waste of time however by the seat of the pants I can say it definately made a big difference once on boost and no noticable lag or loss of response... obviously not 40rwkw worth of difference but it was significant none the less

Hey R32 GTS-turbo, im comparing a Hybrid FMIC to a stock SMIC... it is intresting to see how so many people say that a decent FMIC wont make any power gain...

I would be WRAPPED if my car made 200+rw/kw after my FMIC lol :laugh:

Considering my car pulled a 165rw/kw with misfiring coils and stock boost solenoid (7psi), and now i have new coils and turbotech set at 9psi... i might be making closer to the 170 - 175rw/kw??

I will deffinatly have a before and after power run to see the difference

as said, it might increase power because of colder air but it depends if your running at the limits of the stock cooler. if you are you can expect a nice increase in kw because the cooler would be holding back the flow. however if you put too big a cooler on, fitting it might be a bad idea until you actually have the boost to make full use of the coolers bigger capacity.

I'm sure Autospeed did an article a number of years ago, or maybe it was a tech article in a magazine I read. Essentially the stock intercooler (on R32's at least) as we all know are only designed to handle a specific flow rate, above that restriction sets in. The R32 SMIC performed badly after boost was raised/power increased, I think somewhere in the region of dropping 3-4psi more than a larger FMIC.

The larger FMIC allowed more flow with less resistance (more efficient) and is probably a fair bit more efficient in lowering intake temps = more power again.

I'd say get a FMIC, you may have a little extra lag, but up top there should be good gains, at least on vehicles manufactured with tiny intercoolers such as R32 GTST, R33 GTST, 200sx's, etc.

Fixxxer :)

Yeh i gathered that you were talking about the advantages a FMIC would have over the standard SMIC.

Im putting a FMIC on my 32 gts-t tonight (JustJap one) ill post here tomorrow with some details, expecting slightly more lag (more air required to fill up the spaces) but also expecting it to cope with the boost a little better (running 2 psi higher than standard). Mainly changing it because ill be putting 33 turbo on soon and i know the SMIC definitely wont handle that.

Edited by r32 gts-turbo

On either the WRX or the XR6 its states the boost level was not touched... of coarse you may get an increase of 1 or 2psi due to the more flow and larger intercooler size. On powerdigger.com all the tested cars were stock and show the rw/kw increase when fitted with a hybrid FMIC...

Use the cooler but not the pipework, have some custom pipes made, preferebly with the long pipe before the cooler and short pipe after. can use standard piping down into inner guard, run turbo outlet around behind the cooler, and cooler outlet up to throttle body. the shorter cooler pipe will see you more power. Better quality kits use this system.

The Hybrid piping that runs up behind radiator is long and gets heated. Works more like a interheater.

These pics are from a VL with an RB25 but the same applies to Skylines and we've done the same to R33's.

DSC01425.jpg

DSC01426.jpg

DSC01427.jpg

I have the Hybrid GT kit and was dynoed at 166rwkw before the cooler and made 208rwkw after the cooler...

Disclaimer: different dynoes on different days so comparing results would be a waste of time however by the seat of the pants I can say it definately made a big difference once on boost and no noticable lag or loss of response... obviously not 40rwkw worth of difference but it was significant none the less

I've seen this once before Nick.

It was on the tilbrooks auto and dyno, the car went from ~170 rwkw to 200rwkw, this was on 11psi.

The car was a bit of a freak and went on to run a 13.3.

Not all R33 ECU's are the same. :)

Before my R32 with a bit of boost and exhaust was quicker, after his fmic, well it wasn't. :thumbsup:

On my R32 the FMIC picked up around 3rwkw with a little less response. The biggest difference as stated above was on hot days and or when giving it a hard run through the hills, more consistent power. Before it would tend to begin to feel flat.

its all a myth. if you;

on the same day, on the same dyno, with the same settings (shoout mode locked)

dyno your car with the stock SMIC and get power figure A

dyno your car with the new FMIC and get power figure B

A will be the same as B

most people associate more power with a FMIC installation as they crank up the boost at the same time. ie: go from stock boost to 12psi and yeah you'll make 20rwkw of course, more PSI you dial on the compressor means more airflow. airflow makes power.

you will gain 0rwkw fitting a FMIC and nothing else

at least that certainly applies on a stock to mild card. if you had a 600HP car setup running on the stocker SMIC (highly unlikely) then moved to a suitable FMIC you would likely see some power gain as the stock SMIC would be a big bottleneck and offer no temperature drop or very little. so you just end up dialing in lots of heat. as soon as a FMIC was fitted you would get more temperature drop and you would effectively stuff more air in, as its denser air. i dont think this comes back to stock to mild cars however

in fact if you fit a FMIC and no other changes are made to the car you should notice more throttle lag. this is because when you open the throttle each time you have to pressurize the larger core and pipework. this takes noticably longer than the stocker SMIC and its much shorter pipework system.

so if the inlet size increases and nothing else, then you should have throttle lag

hmm keeping in mind the 33 and 32 coolers are quite significantly different i venture to say that, thats a generalisation and power gains are possible with mildly tuned vehicles running more than standard boost. The 32 cooler was made to handle 10 psi, not more. Adding a slightly larger FMIC would see more flow more cooling, less restriction and possibly some straighter bends (gotta remember that FMIC is getting alot more air on it and cooler air is more dense than hot air = bigger/ better combustion). Adding a huge FMIC, well as paul said, the bigger it is, the less throttle response. However I struggle to believe my SMIC on my rb20 will handle the high flowed r33 turbo i wish to put on it and would significantly restrict the turboes potential (That and if i was going by that theory then the pipes leading out of the cooler that were bent almost till closing point wouldnt need replacing on my stock - mildly tuned vehicle because bigger and more flow isnt better on a stock - mildly tuned vehicle)

Edited by r32 gts-turbo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...