Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NO you read right, gtr turbos kill motors, wheras gtst turbos dont. Could be due to the manifold design, cam timing, maybe because the gtr turbos are smaller, they spin harder and fly apart harder, who kmows.

Ah but they do :P

Two Vic people have killed them, was the shitty series 2 turbo, compressor wheel came off (when the rear let go, unbalanced the shaft) and then the comp wheel minced the motors... yes - it did make it past the cooler!

I couldn't believe it either, its just a very uncommon occurrence

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Perhaps its counter intuitive from a fluid flow perspective, but if we consider the momentum of the pieces of turbine as the wheel lets go - those pieces are mostly flying off toward the manifold against the direction of fluid flow, due to the shape of the turbine lead in. So short manifold = not enough time for the exhaust to slow the shrapnel down and it makes it all the way pass the exhaust valve.

Just a theory.

Actually the pieces coming off have to contend with the scroll shape of the housing and the direction of travel of the turbine so even with the energy release there has to be more happening to create such a reversion pulse that particles enter the engine.

Considering that this doesn't occur in every case it can't be contributed to just the destruction of the turbine, which gives me greater confidence that in the cases where ingestion occurs some degree of blocking by the turbine wheel has to be present. Then it is plausible that pulse inversion causes a negative pressure spike dragging the material into the cylinders. Similar to extractor function, just in reverse.

Alternatively there could be a relationship with exhaust back pressure from the turbo still running that causes flow reversion in the damaged side.

26 has three runners per turbo @ much shorter lengths and less bends.

20/25 has six runnders per turbo @ much longer lengths and harder bends.

I don't think it takes a genious to see why more ceramic can get in the 26 cylinders... either engine will get a taste of dust be it 25 or 26 TT or single

There are a couple of runners that are very close to the turbo so the explanation has to be a little more complex. I'd do some calculations on the mass flow, impulse reversion and relative densities but I'm retired so cbf.

We've all seen compressors have a munch on the housing, which being ally will absolutely go through the pipes and IC causing engine damage but this discussion has little to do with that so we should avoid getting sidetracked.

i would've kept my ceramic ones, great for spooling up quickly.

but yeah, problem was that they were old and the rear wheel broke right off.

just give manufacturers time to perfect the way they are attached and they'll be much better than heavy steel wheels

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...