Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi peoples,

ive been toying with the idea with a garret gt2876 with .7 front cover rated at 440 hp on a rb20 eng. I would make an adaptor plate to fit the standard rb20 manifold.The rb 20 is in a 180sx. Most rb20s ive seen with t3 flange turbos are very laggy.

Has anyone done this and how did the car drive?

Thanks Michael..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/118785-t25-flange-440-hp-turbo-on-rb20/
Share on other sites

OK.

Any other ideas with t25 flange? im looking for between 220 and 240 rwkw with plenty of power around that 3000-3500 rpm. Previously i had a r33 that made 287 rwkw with a GCG internal waste gate turbo but couldnt run less than 17psi due to the flapper valve not being big enough. That eng made plenty of power down low and now going to rb20 is a bit laggy considering its only got a r33 turbo on it.

Michael...

Thats the RB20 for ya mate.

Have a read of the RB20 sticky thread

The the sticky "Forced Induction Guide" there is lots of RB20 info threads... but get used to haveing no torque. Its part and parcel of owning an RB20 powered car

Any other ideas with t25 flange? im looking for between 220 and 240 rwkw with plenty of power around that 3000-3500 rpm.

sorry to say mate.. but its a rb20 if you want heaps of power around that rev range.. you might even have to go a 320hp GT25 by garrett.. but than your probaly looking at around 220ishrwkw (rough guess)

rb20's are wierd with turbo choices.. glad i never ended up modifyn my rb20 as the cost i could have spent on it ive ended up with a 26 with a few little mods instead but each to there own

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...