Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got torque????....

and no revs!!! ;)

jk..farken monster!!!!

lol

myeah mine wont be doin over 7k so i guess thats about the same really.

oo that should flow really well but still have some nice response. it will be interesting to drive against you on track of course.

softcock, rev it til it stops making power...

im probably set my limiter to 7200 as thats what robbie (RIPS) recommends the motor is built for

would be good to have a built 25 reving to something spastic like noels but Im sure my wallet has so far been considerably less damaged than noels!

how many rb30's have died from over revving? i havnt seen any

minell be making power upto around 9000-9500, im confident itll be happy at them sort of revs

softcock, rev it til it stops making power...

how many rb30's have died from over revving? i havnt seen any

minell be making power upto around 9000-9500, im confident itll be happy at them sort of revs

You're going to need to make some oil gallery modifications if you want to run it at 9-9.5k and think about buying a forged crank.

The RB30 isn't designed to rev that high reliably especially when you are going to be making 700awhp.

Speaking of which, I need to talk to you about those modifications you will need to make....and it's not doing any dumb shite like knife edging the crank.

You're going to need to make some oil gallery modifications if you want to run it at 9-9.5k and think about buying a forged crank.

The RB30 isn't designed to rev that high reliably especially when you are going to be making 700awhp.

Speaking of which, I need to talk to you about those modifications you will need to make....and it's not doing any dumb shite like knife edging the crank.

we need to talk...

Hey Col what is the go with the user sigs?

Mine is cut off at the last part of the pic, it is one whole pic and I have noticed quite a few others with halve a line of text at the bottom.

yo shane you back on the 3L thing - just trying to make sense of all that went on in my absence lastnight?

ive never been off the 3l thing lol

speaking of such, 3hrs of machining to go on my girdle, i hate weekends and public hollidays :D

Hey Col what is the go with the user sigs?

Mine is cut off at the last part of the pic, it is one whole pic and I have noticed quite a few others with halve a line of text at the bottom.

try installing ie6 - it dont like ie7 and the smart cookies of sau reduced the sizes of the sigs - genious' :D

:rolleyes:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...