Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So the saga continues but in different form.

Received a (very roughly) typed letter from my daughters day care (does not even contain a letter head nor is signed by anyone) stating that we cannot provide any foods that contains ANY nuts due to a child in the centre having a nut allergy.

In addition to that, we need to read the back of ALL snack products as they may contain traces of nuts.

I can deal with the first line, but the second one is ticking the fark right OFF ME!!!! I am SO farkin pissed off tonite with all of this......

Not only do we not have time to read the back all of all snack foods but 95% of all snack products contain traces of nuts which is impossible to administer.

So tomorrow I am going to drop my daughter off to her day care, then go to the manager and give them a peace of my mind as follows.....................

DAFAQ AM I PAYING $80 PER DAY FOR?????

So the saga continues but in different form.

Received a (very roughly) typed letter from my daughters day care (does not even contain a letter head nor is signed by anyone) stating that we cannot provide any foods that contains ANY nuts due to a child in the centre having a nut allergy.

In addition to that, we need to read the back of ALL snack products as they may contain traces of nuts.

I can deal with the first line, but the second one is ticking the fark right OFF ME!!!! I am SO farkin pissed off tonite with all of this......

Not only do we not have time to read the back all of all snack foods but 95% of all snack products contain traces of nuts which is impossible to administer.

So tomorrow I am going to drop my daughter off to her day care, then go to the manager and give them a peace of my mind as follows.....................

DAFAQ AM I PAYING $80 PER DAY FOR?????

solution.

give her a snickers share pack.

say you either didnt get the letter, or thought it was fake due to no letter head or details.

So the saga continues but in different form.

Received a (very roughly) typed letter from my daughters day care (does not even contain a letter head nor is signed by anyone) stating that we cannot provide any foods that contains ANY nuts due to a child in the centre having a nut allergy.

In addition to that, we need to read the back of ALL snack products as they may contain traces of nuts.

I can deal with the first line, but the second one is ticking the fark right OFF ME!!!! I am SO farkin pissed off tonite with all of this......

Not only do we not have time to read the back all of all snack foods but 95% of all snack products contain traces of nuts which is impossible to administer.

So tomorrow I am going to drop my daughter off to her day care, then go to the manager and give them a peace of my mind as follows.....................

DAFAQ AM I PAYING $80 PER DAY FOR?????

Tyler was given an old cheese sandwich today by a girl at Kindy. Funny thing is that dairy is banned. So are nuts. So is 90% of everything we eat. Ill be having a little chat with them. :$

solution.

give her a snickers share pack.

say you either didnt get the letter, or thought it was fake due to no letter head or details.

Brilliant!

So much CYA (cover your ass) from the centre its not funny.........how the hell do they think parents are to be held accountable for the food we give them when we are not even there is just completely inappropriate and outright appalling.

Tyler was given an old cheese sandwich today by a girl at Kindy. Funny thing is that dairy is banned. So are nuts. So is 90% of everything we eat. Ill be having a little chat with them. :$

Its BS that it has come to this Tony

Had something called glayva tonight for the second time just two shots on Ice... Was f**king awesome! :woot:

Sounds like an interesting liqueur. Will have to taste it someday.

On that note I'm gonna take my grumpy ass to bed and get some sleep so I can blow up day care tomorrow and govia.

Nite all.

PS Nick, I hope you got in your house somehow.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...