Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i see your point, but when ever i have been looking at parts they always seem more expensive...and how much boost can you run on stock sr engine...i have heard of people running more the 1 bar on stock rb's. not saying that there is much different, and like always i am not sayin one is better then the other.

an sr is a new engine, better technology, but like an rb they have there down falls.

who you callin sexy.....whore man

Been looking at lots of parts lately and the SR ones are usually cheaper

Marki I ran 18psi for a year on my stock RB25 and the headgasket did not blow, 17 to 18psi is considered the limit

I ran 23psi on an unopened RB25. Buggered if I know how but it refused to die, I had another bottom end ready to go but I ended up not needing it. Certainly not something I'd recommend trying though :P I just did it because I considered the stock bottom end to be expendable lol

im actually soo use to him not picking up, i just leave messages, i get a supprise when he actually does pick up :P

really, ive never had dan miss a call from me.

i must be the favourite

Bishes *tips hat*

YEO!!!!

lol and pg2me

smich as

Been looking at lots of parts lately and the SR ones are usually cheaper

Marki I ran 18psi for a year on my stock RB25 and the headgasket did not blow, 17 to 18psi is considered the limit

times change i guess...this was a few years ago when i was.

hey Bunta i need advice on a 25 build.!!!

i see your point, but when ever i have been looking at parts they always seem more expensive...and how much boost can you run on stock sr engine...i have heard of people running more the 1 bar on stock rb's. not saying that there is much different, and like always i am not sayin one is better then the other.

an sr is a new engine, better technology, but like an rb they have there down falls.

who you callin sexy.....whore man

yeah but they dont recommend it..

ohh ive been waiting for this ready.. 18-24psi on the SR safely.. :P with standard head gasket... *runs from dan to avoid abusive language from listening to sheep on ns.com*

Bishes *tips hat*

hiya marc..

really, ive never had dan miss a call from me.

i must be the favourite

it didnt ring out..

im just saying in general.. the prices are cheaper for the unliked 4 bangers.. as in coilpanks cheaper GKtech have full turbo back exhaust for 400 new.. turbos are cheaper most of the time for say T2 flanges. pfcs are cheaper.. only cause they are more common on the SR u can pick up a redtop SR pfc for 4-600 and here a R33 gtst one goes for 1250 in a matter of hours.

also clutches and boxes cheaper.. diffs cheaper. yes they are weaker but less weight play a part in the design..

im just saying in general.. the prices are cheaper for the unliked 4 bangers.. as in coilpanks cheaper GKtech have full turbo back exhaust for 400 new.. turbos are cheaper most of the time for say T2 flanges. pfcs are cheaper.. only cause they are more common on the SR u can pick up a redtop SR pfc for 4-600 and here a R33 gtst one goes for 1250 in a matter of hours.

also clutches and boxes cheaper.. diffs cheaper. yes they are weaker but less weight play a part in the design..

b b b but they still sounds shit.....

:P:):rofl:

mine sounds like VTEC up high.. ahaha stupid exhaust..

hahahahahaha

I cant believe what i just read, there is something seriously wrong with you mark please consult a physician urgently

Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome

Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome

Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome

Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome

bahahaha

thats the funniest thing uve said all week noel...

ok i admit black adn chrom look good but still prefer black face chrome lip.. not full face chrome.. and admit a hid kit would look horn..

hmm.. i might buy a cheapo shit box skyrine 32 and put a F20C into it... :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...