Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As far as I've had it explained to me the factory ecu works as follows from the engine speed input and the air flow meter input the ECU calculates a pulse width that should give a stochiometric air:fuel ratio ie 14.7:1. The with that speed and air flow information it looks up a table which contains a number. That number is a multiplier for the pulse width. I do not know for certain, but I don't think that the multiplier can be less than one, ie acts to shorted the pulse width with should give an leaner mixture then 14.7:1.

If you are running in closed loop mode, the ECU can run leaner, but anything over about 30% load/throttle and the ECU will not enter closed loop mode, ie the 02 sensor isn't even looked at most of the time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-214101
Share on other sites

Adding to the above, the oxygen sensor (I'm assuming you are talking about the one off the exhaust?) is not the only one that the ECU makes it decision, and its a balance of that, AFM sensor, the intake air temp (before the intake manifold), and THR position (butterfly open/close %). Then of course it has to work out how much fuel is going in, boost levels, etc.

Its a complex equation thats for sure!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-214135
Share on other sites

The only time you should have noticed the O2 sensor was faulty would be on 'cruise' (constatnt throttle, constant speed). On a WOT ie accelerating, which most dyno runs are, the O2 sensor would be out of the equation. Nissan programs the ECU to run rich-as on WOT.

So its possible the dyno operator was having a lend of you.

I have replaced mine - for a different reason - and it cost about $150 from Nissan (its a NGK unit, so you might try contacting NGK).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-220863
Share on other sites

im in the middle of building an Air/Fuel meter from one of those jaycar kits. it says the chip in the kit is matched to a particular bosch o2 sensor (making it not perfectly accurate with other o2 sensors). this is because of the skew of the lamda values outside stichiometric ratio (14.7) can be different between various sensors.

anyway to use this accurately on my r31 im going to have to reprogram the PIC chip mappings

hence i think you need an o2 sensor which reports similar lamda values to the original one (for the factory ecu)

mine is rattling (ie stuffed - the sensor inside is broken in half) and i'm planning to go the NGK ones for my RB30 which was $130 repco

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12044-o2-sensor/#findComment-224866
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...