Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Congrats guys!! thats the name i want to name my future son!! All the best for the future.

Just to inform you all, Bek gave birth to an absolutely gorgeous baby boy (der!) this morning at 6:05am.

Details are:

Name: Garrett Nicholas Lee

Date: 4/06/06

Time: 6:05am

Weight: 9lb 1oz

Length: 55cm

Details: 10 fingers, 10 toes and all his tackle :D

Good luck guys and by the love we saw this afternoon, I have no doubt that Garrett has two very loving parents ;) We wish you all the very best on your new journey in life and enduring the ups and downs that parenthood brings.

garrett.jpg

Yeah he'll be alrite. He is a genuine Garrett, not a cheap chinese copy.

Bad luck getting both at once, but I guess better now than later in life. Wouldnt want him missing out on 2 weeks of school or anything exciting and as usefull as that.

But seriously he'll be ok.

Bek again (meh to changing into account)... he seemed alot better when we were up there tonight... I was even able to give him a breastfed without him falling asleep (up until now he just didnt have the energy to fed and would fall asleeP) So fingers crossed that this a sign of things to come.

ill update again tomorrow sometime...

Thanks everyone for all the well wishes and support, it means alot!

Update - (bekky again)

He didnt get worse overnight :D and seems to be back to the point before he got pneumonia... must be everybody praying and wishing him well for him.

thanks again everyone, it means alot to me and Jason to have this support at the moment.

Bekky again

Garrett was discharged today :) We are now at home. Vistors are only welcome if you are in NO WAY sick... Mummy and Daddy are very very protective of his health now. So no afternoon/night time outtings, no cuddles with sick ppl....

We are very thankful to have our little boy home!

what great news guys!

lets make that the last hospital visit for quite a while hey Garrett. :) Mummy and Daddy's nerves have had quite enough i think.

And i hope he gets back into routine easily for you bek. :S

Jaime Mike & Tarquin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...