Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Basically started off with a random breath test on doncaster road near westfield. Blew clear, then like 20m down the road another lot were set up - the EPA for random emissions testing.

My mate got defected in his brother's 300ZX TT tonight - too low, bald rears and no number plate lights. What interested me more was that he passed the EPA random test. I will check with him tomorrow, but i'm pretty sure that this car has gutted cats... What worries me now is that if i get random EPA tested, will my car pass the emissions test...? It has a 'race cat' but i suppose the question really is - can the car still pass emssions without the cat?

Has anyone ever been random checked by the EPA?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12152-epa-random-tests/
Share on other sites

OK, by what i know, they do the whole noise test and emissions test on the spot, i guess they'd do a look over of your engine bay too.

But still, CAN the car pass the emissions test without / with a gutted cat? Does anyone know?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12152-epa-random-tests/#findComment-217713
Share on other sites

Faulty or no CAT will definitely show up on EGA as they will get a high hydrocarbon reading. I haven't seen the equipmeny they are using at the moment but I'm reasonably sure they haven't changed the way they check. As for the $10,000 fine, I've never heard of this being issued against any individual.....has anyone else?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12152-epa-random-tests/#findComment-219017
Share on other sites

Hey Inasnt

I went for my EPA test at Macloud today... (I was suppose to go last week, but I had put it off till this week)

I passed the noise test right on the nose at 90db !!!

talk about close....

As for Emissions test - didn't even test it.. he said skylines run very clean - so he didn't bother to test it... The fact the my Low Fuel Warning Light was glaring him in the eyes while he did the noise test may have atributed to his desission not to do the emissions test.. :P

But the big thing is that the Sound test was done at 5100 rpm

(not the usual 3200 rpm that the exhaust shops test at)

He said that a Twin Turbo 2.6 L has to be tested at 5100...

At the EPA they work off a more detailed Vehicle Reference Book then the epa approved exhaust shop test centers have...

And as the test centers don't have the detailed book - they test at the default for a NA 6 cyl. which is 3200rpm....

They also also asked me if I had changed my exhaust since my last EPA test in november 2002 when it tested at 85db at an exhaust shop test center... I said "Yes, I changed it when I got this latest epa notice... if I am going to get epa notices while running with a 85 db muffler then I might as well run one that is 90db"

He said "fair enough" and passed me :P

Originally posted by INASNT

opps misread that!

Ring up a few exhaust places, 1 of em should have 1, not nuttin special from when i had to go to epa in mcloud to get mine done

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12152-epa-random-tests/#findComment-228871
Share on other sites

Guest INASNT

sideways

they tested my car at 5100rpm 2. I was gonna ask them wtf they were doing but since it only read 83db with thew stock exhaust i used for that day i didnt say anything.

My car was actually running rich as they told me coz i put back on all the stock stuff which changed all the flows. Did a tall guy with glasses and grey beard test your car?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12152-epa-random-tests/#findComment-229384
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

i think theyre supposed to test at around 3/4 of the redline

for engineers certificate for my rb25 silvia, it test was carried out at 5625 (3/4 of 7500) and did 89.5 dBa on (what i think is) a 2.5" full exhaust with canon (exhaust pics here)...this is nsw though, not sure on differences with vic

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12152-epa-random-tests/#findComment-879634
Share on other sites

i would like to say ive been done with epa on saterday night i have no cat i got $2000 fine for waste and poulltion as i wasent sure on this in vic as i still have my south aussie plates still on my car as they didnt defect me just fine me and belive me it ant worth not haveing one it sucks for all those who dont have a cat belive me get one the fine is 2 rich and they said they catch me again and i still dont have it fixwd they well double the fine and they keep on double it until u get one so go and getone mates

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12152-epa-random-tests/#findComment-881984
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...