Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My car currently runs 215/45/17 on the front, and 235/45/17 on the rear. My rims are 17x7 front, and 17x8 rear.

Im of the understanding that i could fit 215s all round, but is there any tyre performance issues other then those associated with reduced surface area, that would stop you putting a 215 on an 8" rim?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/
Share on other sites

That's a first!! I never heard of anyone wanting to go smaller in the rears.

I have F:245/35/19 and R:275/30/19. Have had no problems and just some minor rubbing of the plastic gaurd insert, as i turn up drive-ways. But the car does have a set of Tein suspension, which are relatively stiff.

PS: Gaurds have NOT been lipped, as i am not prepared to respray the car when the paint cracks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-219222
Share on other sites

Reason for wanting to go 215s all round was firstly im able to get some R compund track tyres for good $$$, but they are 215.

The guards on my R32 have been rolled and still anything wider then 235 on the rear rubs, and anything wider then 215s on front rubs.

I have had a set of work rims on the car with different offset that allowed 255 on rear and 235 on front without rubbing, but the 255s sat outside the rear guards, looked too 13B drag Corolla for my liking.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-220077
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, tyre sizes do vary between brands, even the same brand has anomalies. We have 235/40/17 Yokohama A032R's on the front that are 239mm wide and 245/45/17 on the rear which are 243 mm wide. So 235 versus 245 should be 10 mm wider, but they are only 4 mm wider.

Oils ain't oils, Sol.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-221651
Share on other sites

I have 235/40/17 on the front and 255/40/17 on the rear...

I have noticed that the front tyres wear unevenly now...

The inside 1 inch wearing bald while the majority of the tyres are chunky as...

Anyone else getting this ?

I am told that sometimes Skylines do this, or that wide tyres cause this...

Also finding that the guard-liners are wearing against the front tyres somehow...

Thing is, I've had it for years and its only started doing this in the last year...and I can't figure out if it is worn suspension or my driving on corners...

The initial indicator I noticed in the area was that the guard liners pop to the outside of the guard lip, and I have to sometimes push them back in behind them...

I'm interested to find if others have any similar signs...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-233736
Share on other sites

Last time i got a wheel alignment i started going thru front tyres...too much camber.

Didnt notice any difference either by feel, lap times, or in consistancy so have dropped some camber out of the front. Tyres seem to be wearing better now.

You R33 owners are spoilt, just like my friend in his 200SX, your guards swallow 18s, even 19s, or nice and wide 17s.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-235215
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Roy

You R33 owners are spoilt, just like my friend in his 200SX, your guards swallow 18s, even 19s, or  nice and wide 17s.

What you mean OR, i have the best of both: 19" x 8" rims all round with F:245/35/19 and R:275/30/19. :D :shake: :) :shake:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-235548
Share on other sites

Hi PuppaDuck, tyres wearing on inside = too much negative camber or incorrect toe settings. Puting wider (or narrower) tyres on should not affect the suspension geometry. Either way have it checked. Toe should be set at zero or slightly toe out. Camber is a little more tricky as it depends on your driving style. Anything more than 1 degree negative on a road car can be a problem.

If you like the handling feel of negative camber, try more caster instead. All of the advantages, but no increase in inside tyre wear.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-236470
Share on other sites

Thanks SydneyKid...

I'll put this to the next guy I go to for a wheel alignment...

I have no personal choice nor do I know what to ask for...

But if I can get front tyres to last longer than a year by wearing even then I'll be happy...

Maybe he was put off by not knowing what settings to put it on cause the R33 isn't in his book...or perhaps he wasn't sure about the HICAS...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-236478
Share on other sites

Hi PuppaDuck, since HICAS is rear steering I have no idea why that would effect what he thinks should go on the front. I'd find a better wheel alignment shop. We use Whiteline (Wedge) at Minto or Heasmans (Doug) at Sydenham. East Coast are also OK.

The "local tyre shop" is generally a waste of time.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12182-tyre-width/#findComment-236946
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...