Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

was wondering if the GT30R internal gated will fit in the stock low mount position of the factory turbo

if so is it an easy fit or a tight fit and are the water and oil lines easy to setup for this

cheers guys

andrew

well there are no int gated housings at this stage in that line... still not out from garrett...

So what housing have you had machined up?

What A/R is it?

Is it a R33 rear housing? VG30?

garrett has a line of them in internal gate, its on horsepowerinabox site and racespec site

A/R they have are 0.63, 0.82 and 1.06 i want the 0.63 for quicker spool

and im not to sure what housing it is but mounts onto my t3 manifold

That is a custom made jobby from hpiab. They are a VG30 second hand rear housing from memory.

Garrett is just about to release the intrnal gated GT30R this month. I should find out this week.

In answer to your question though...the turbo will need to be spaced away as the comp housing is rather large. The oil and water lines will need to be made up. I suggest braided. These can be made for around the $250 mark. The inlet will also have to be changed due to the large turbo mouth.The dump pipe angle will also change so you might have to cut it under the car and rotate then re-attach.

As 3lit said, they are not on the market yet.

So you've got the VG rear... alhough im now worried about what comp wheel it has in in...

But on the matter at hand, as 3lit also said, youll have to change all the stuff around it

havent they been out at gcg and unique autosports for ages..... we are talking bout the gt3040 arent we???? if so someone else on here has done it in the stock position i remember lookin at it has the whole install process on photos, i think its in the forced section

Edited by sinistagtst

i havent got it yet aye im just hell interested in buying one when they come out or if they are available atm

for around the 2k mark there the only turbo from garrett that are rated for more than 400hp

well they are a hybrid, not an "offering" from Garrett at all

What about...

http://www.gcg.com.au/Catalogue_Menus/Upgr...pgrade_gtst.htm

Another hybrid, well tested, well proven

well im tossing up between that gcg highflow or a gt30r but gt30r more work to be applied to make it all fit in and running where as the gcg is all staight in straight out

my aim for the car is to get 350 rwhp

GCG Ball Bearing High Flow on the Group Buy for $1750 delivered with all the parts necessary to fit straight on.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=121128

:P cheers :)

If you want 350rwhp an you get the gcg high flow factor in doing your cams as well, I have searched on these forums and not that many high flows have reached your figure of 260 rwkw.

The GT30R will be able to achieve this figure easily with more tuning maybe more, I have had a good look into the two myself. Im going with the GT30 I guess it depends on a few other things though as well like wat are you wating to do with 350rwhp ,track ,drift ,1/4. Wat other supporting mods would be in place to back up the turbo.

well the car is set for track

i have pfc, fmic, pod, z32, ebc, fuel pump and fuel reg, turbo back zorst and when i get the turbo ill get bigger injectors

my car is tuned at 261 hp on a base/safe tune due to my turbo seal goin it cant be tuned for more otherwise bang

*sigh* they are external only.

any internal models are having other housings machined up to suit as the garrett items are not yet released

if people cant understand that yet i give up

have seen a similar turbo low mounted, it was off the new falcon, featured ar.7 compressor cover and ar.82 rear internally gated. extensive modification of the engine mount necessary. plus custom plumbing in speedflow for oil & water feeds and custom dump pipe, intake pipe & intercooler pipe. looks fully standard though, cant pick it other than the large intake pipe.

hey guys

was wondering if the GT30R internal gated will fit in the stock low mount position of the factory turbo

if so is it an easy fit or a tight fit and are the water and oil lines easy to setup for this

cheers guys

andrew

well im swaying more to the gcg as there is minimal work and expense to install is and running it

and if this turbo can give me 330-350 rwhp ill be happy :D

cheers

andrew

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...