Jump to content
SAU Community

How many people bring their GF's/BF's To cruises?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by XCUZME

girlfriends arent supposed to come on cruises. theyre supposed to stay at home so we can pick up new women with our cars.

dude, ive been to a few meetups north and west side. no one picks up any gals, or maybe your just a dud? :(

well, i bring the pre-misus along, otherwise she goes skitzo at westfields shopping or she sits and cries...

theres a few gals that show up at every cruise.

Originally posted by Nismodified

dude, ive been to a few meetups north and west side. no one picks up any gals, or maybe your just a dud? :(

then you haven't come to a REAL northside meetup :)

come cruising with us next time, I have a 2 out of 2 record going atm :)

she went to one

thats all it took

now im free to go myself

however everytime i leave to go for a "cruse" she calls me a tool and ful sik, or something about cruzing george street with the seat cranked back

i just tell her i do that but relly go down the nasho by myself

lol

I agree women are only good to bring if they are going to get involved. If they just spend the night sitting in your car you'll end up home early.

I think i have brought about 3 or 4 different women along to cruise without any problems.

I used to try and convince my ex to come along...he was never really interested though...or if he did come he would whinge and want to go home before I was ready :(

i ended up going by myself or taking male friends instead :)

Originally posted by Shell

I used to try and convince my ex to come along...he was never really interested though...or if he did come he would whinge and want to go home before I was ready :(  

i ended up going by myself or taking male friends instead ;)

There's no question as to who wore the pants in that relationship.....:) :) :P

Heheh pete, Dom knows EXACTLY what you do when you go out cruising... that's why she doesn't come! LOL - that aside, she is one of the few girls I have met apart from Shell that genuinely like cars.... now all we have to do is convince her to join me on the skidpan! bwahahahaahah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...