Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

just wondering would there be an advantage of using a tyre with a bigger wall e.g (60) for less wheel spin of the line?

for e.g i used my 17/45/235 rims (potenza gIII) last time for the 1/4 mile and it was getting heaps of wheel spin (b/button clutch) if i used a 16/60/215 but flattend to say 16-18psi would it grip more as the tyre has more flex on the wall?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/122799-tyre-heightswidth-for-14-mile/
Share on other sites

Think about it logically for a second. Why does increased sidewall flex give more grip?

The deformation of the sidewall then increases the effective surface area because the tyre squashes and spreads.

But if you're going with a tyre that has less contact patch, then all you're doing is getting it to a point where the contact patch was the same size as the less flexy but wider tyre.

Obviously the final word will depend on the specific application and would require testing, but logically all I can see happening is you having the same amount of grip.

If you were going to a 235/60 R16 tyre from a 235/45 R17 I'd say yes, but since your "new" tyre choice is narrower I'd say it was pretty line ball (assuming your tyre is the same make and model).

thanks, ye that sounds right, just had a few ppl tell me dont bother with rims (something like a 45 profile) as it will only spin especially with a b/bustton clutch, i will be testing both sets of tyres this saturday so wel see what happends,

has anybody had any Actual experiences were they have compared a both smaller and larger profiles?

The bigger the diameter, the harder it is to spin. The wider the tyre, the more grip. The bigger the profile, the more it will absorb the shock from take off. The lower the pressure, the more it will absorb the shock from take off, and increase contact patch. This is all assuming all other this are equal. Also big burnouts are bad for street tyres, but good for race tyres, if using street tyres, try driving around the water box and just spin the tyres enough to make sure they are clean ie no stones etc.

Think about it logically for a second. Why does increased sidewall flex give more grip?

The deformation of the sidewall then increases the effective surface area because the tyre squashes and spreads.

Wrong. By your logic, Top Fuel cars would be using 60" wide slicks with 40mm of sidwall and running the times they are - or better!?!?!?

Think about it logically for a second.

Adrian

ye that right,

so im assuming the 16/215/60 will work betta say at 18-20psi than the 17/235/45?

i think the main problem is the clutch coz it so frictiony and its pretty much impossible to ride and from the take of shock/stress on the small profile just starts spining. the car makes just over 200rwk.

any ideas on a better take of strategy

the 17's are potenza gIII's, and the 16's are good year eagle ga

The width of the tyre also makes a big difference, people often state that to increase grip you should fit a wider tyre, but thats not always true, your cars weight is simply spread over more surface area of tyre with a wider choice, a narrower tyre can actually provide more stability.

Matching your cars gearing to the your tyres diameter is also very important. Genrally the samller the diameter wheel/tyre the better the acceleration, but lower the top speed.

Tyre pressures also effect the cars grip, as does the friction co-efficient of the tyres rubber, the weight on each tyre and the force applied to them.

Mate,

as a guide - I have dunlop 3000R's on my 33gtst - just a normal road tyre basically!

225/60/16

I dropped the pressure down to 22psi and was doing 1.9 60 footers at WSID (stock clutch) with a gay effort burnout haha

that might help you in theory >_<

Edited by evil_weevil
Mate,

as a guide - I have dunlop 3000R's on my 33gtst - just a normal road tyre basically!

225/60/16

I dropped the pressure down to 22psi and was doing 1.9 60 footers at WSID (stock clutch) with a gay effort burnout haha

that might help you in theory :D

thats a pretty mad 60'' time man, ye standard clutch is much better than b/button as theres no ride in the clutch its on or off, so wen u try take off at 3-4000rpm ~~~~~

what was your finanal 1/4 mile time with a your 60' at 1.9 and mph?

Usually fitting the widest possible tyre to the rim will give you good traction. You know how some people stretch 225s over 9" rims. Well you want to do the opposite basically. The sidewalls will flex more and the contact patch will be better to begin with too.

This is probably the reason why evil_weevil was getting good 60 foots, because of the fact that 225s are wide for a 6.5" rim.

This is probably the reason why evil_weevil was getting good 60 foots, because of the fact that 225s are wide for a 6.5" rim.

no....I thought it was because I'm such a skillful driver?? hehehehe jokes :whistling:

Some people thought I was running semi's because of the 1.9's.

Launching is an art - their is more to it then how wide your tyres are or what brand of rubber they are.

Track prep, track temperature, clutch type, tyre compound, tyre pressure, horsepower, rpm etc all influence your launch.

On a side note I have a pair of unused 300ZX rims with very very warn Nitto NT555R rubber (255's) sitting in my garage if someone wants to throw some mulla my way :laugh:

Launching is an art - their is more to it then how wide your tyres are or what brand of rubber they are.

Track prep, track temperature, clutch type, tyre compound, tyre pressure, horsepower, rpm etc all influence your launch.

On a side note I have a pair of unused 300ZX rims with very very warn Nitto NT555R rubber (255's) sitting in my garage if someone wants to throw some mulla my way :laugh:

I can tell you that someone should use ben's tyres asap. Those tyres have gone 1.68 60' before :D Awesome

I can tell you that someone should use ben's tyres asap. Those tyres have gone 1.68 60' before :laugh: Awesome

i would take them, but i live in melb spuin an need them for saturday,

any special take off techneeks with brass button clutches? were u cant really ride? ive tried hand brake helps a little

TOY - practice makes perfect?

keep practicing and you will soon find out the best way :laugh:

Adrian - In the NSw times thread - most other people are doing 2.0 + 60footers, m impressed with my efforts :D

TOY - practice makes perfect?

keep practicing and you will soon find out the best way :P

Adrian - In the NSw times thread - most other people are doing 2.0 + 60footers, m impressed with my efforts :O

Didn't mean it to sound like a knock, mate. Good work on the times! Just wanted to make the point that the 60' was about right for a more than capable driver on crappy tyres. More of a compliment when i thought it than when i re-read it.

Buy some better rubber champ - you wont know your car!

Adrian

hahaha Oh I know you werent having a go mate, sorry if I came across like that !!

In my old VT LS1 my best was 2.3...hahah

Yep - Going to do some research with the tyre rating thread asap and get some good rubber !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...