Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you are talking about the Gibson Motorsport R32 GTR's......

Engine: RB26DETT with, NISMO racing block or carillo rods, 9:5:1 compression, Garett T3-T28 hybrid turbos, adjustable cam gears, custom airbox, CAMS pop-off valve, NPTI computer, 4-inch exhaust, Gilmer mechanical fuel pump, NISMO 550cc injectors, twin Bosch fuel pumps

PERFORMANCE:470kw @7500rpm, 1.9bar

DRIVELINE: Holinger six-speed gearbox, triple-plate Tilton clutch

BRAKES & SUSPENSION:14.8 slotted Alcon rotors, four-spot AP clipers at the front, 13 inch rotors and four-spot Harrops at the rear, brake water spray, Bilstein coil-covers, custom blade swaybars.

WHEELS & TYRES: Castalloy custom 18x10-inch rims, slicks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12324-bathurst-gtrs/#findComment-223254
Share on other sites

The most famous was Gibson Motorsport no1. This was the R32 GTR driven by Jim Richards and Mark Skaife which crashed out and still controversely won the 1992 Mount Panorama battle after the race was red flagged due to the conditions of the weather.

These GTR's were still given weight penalty's as soon as officials realised that the GTR's were too fast around Australian tracks. Originally the GTRs made 470kw at 7500rpm with 656Nm of torque at 6000rpm. Achieved by running boost of 1.6-1.9 bar (23.5-28psi). The car weighed in at 1360kg giving a power to weight ratio of 2.89kg per kilowatt. Beginning at the start of the GTR's last season officials handed Gibson a 40kg weight penalty as well as a pop-off valve to limit boost to 1.3 bar (19psi). Power dropped to 336kw and torque plummeted to 469Nm. Even after this the GTR's were still good for a 0-100km/h time of 3.6 secs and a quater mile time of 11.5 seconds.

Gibson didn't take any chances with the RB26DETT and ran 8 of them in their GTR's!!!! in those days a new RB26 cost $100,000. Rebuilding cost $25 g's! 2 ran in the cars, 4 in the transporter and another two back in the Gibson workshop.

The famous chasis no5 or Gibson Motorsport No1 R32 GTR has been fully restored and is currently privately owned and displayed at the National Motor Racing Museum in Bathurst.

There is heaps more info in Zoom magazine no49 who ran a feature article on the original Bathurst Godzilla. For more info on the Bathurst Tooheys 1000 of 91 and 92 check out the DVD "The Turbolent Years" - features highlights of the GTR kicking arse and even the infamous scene where Jim Richards sticks it to the V8 fans on the Winners podium!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12324-bathurst-gtrs/#findComment-223269
Share on other sites

Originally posted by GT-Rmgedon

The famous chasis no5 or Gibson Motorsport No1 R32 GTR has been fully restored and is currently privately owned and displayed at the National Motor Racing Museum in Bathurst.

It's actually back "home" in Terry's garage at the moment, flanked either side by George Fury's Bluebird and an immaculate 1967 Prince Skyline GT....

here are few pics from when a few of the SVD group members were invited up for lunch and a "drool" over the cars at the Terry's place.

10pic1-med.jpg

10pic2.jpg

10pic3-med.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12324-bathurst-gtrs/#findComment-223659
Share on other sites

Heh, I remember that race...

Has anyone here done laps around mount panorama? I lived there for 21 years and did laps every week that I had my license, and I still make trips to Bathurst for the sole reason of having a couple of laps :-) I never get tired of it - heh, it was the only place that I could ever get my N12 pulsar to get 4 wheels sliding :-)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12324-bathurst-gtrs/#findComment-224459
Share on other sites

I've driven round a few times (at the speed limit, of course), and alos do a hill climb and super sprint along 2 sections.

Its incredible how narrow the track is over the top of the mountain, its no wonder no-one ever overakes up there!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12324-bathurst-gtrs/#findComment-224543
Share on other sites

This meeting they just called in "Group A/C". Only 5 cars running unfortunately. Was raced by Roderick Markland.

Laptimes are here: http://www.racetime.com.au/?event=i0302

Fsatest lap was 1:08.6187. Bloody quick!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12324-bathurst-gtrs/#findComment-225309
Share on other sites

Roy,

Terry sold his "Racing Duties" R31 (No. 33) to Rod Markland (who now races it with the original No.12).

Keep an eye out though, Terry will be returning with another of the Gibson cars to race. Now that will be great to see TWO Nissans on the front row :P

Airzone,

Yeah whenever possible - it's just quite boring at 60 km/h though ;)

88Silhouette,

It's distributed by Chevron Publishing and it's called "The Turbolent Years". Available in VHS and DVD. Try your local Motoring Bookshop or Motoring Video store,

12158.jpg

http://www.pitstop.net.au/pitstop/prog/Ope...13PUM&PLU=12158

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/12324-bathurst-gtrs/#findComment-225543
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...