Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

125psi is pretty low.

the figures seem TOO close together. if they were that low i would think there would be small variances of 3-5psi between them at least. thats my opinion rather than expert advice so just get another one done somewhere else.

I tested mine when dropping the new injectors in, it runs wiseco forged pistons that have been setup on the looser side so they do slap a tad when cold.

When I finally got around to testing the comp ratio the motor had done around 20,000km's, wasn't using any oil.

To my suprise ALL cylinders were equal apart from cylinder 3 that read 1psi different. :D

I got 153psi or there abouts I don't remember exactly but it was around the mid 150's.

So when warm and the pistons fill the bore a little better no doubt I will receive a higher reading.

So yes, equal values in every cylinder is possible. :dry:

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

it is possible, but at the 125psi level you'd probably start to get figures that arent so close together, let alone exactly the same.

Yes for such a low level, but it may just be the guage. Which is why the general rule is to go off variation.

Cam timing could also be out, maybe rebuilt some time with lower comp pistons, thicker headgasket.. Could be a number of things.

My Rb20DET with std cam timing saw 145psi in all cylinders, that was at 60,000km's. Cam timing does make a difference to the comp ratio.

ok, is your car still running fine?

using oil?

what do people think about this?

Beef

It is running pretty good for a 5 cyl but using a bit of oil...

i put about a litre of lucas in it on the weekend and she is running good again.

It still boosts and goes hard.. emm did i mention that it smokes a shitload!! :P

It only has to last me a few more weeks till i drop a RB25 in her.. then i will re-build the RB20 to sell.

Cam timing could also be out, maybe rebuilt some time with lower comp pistons, thicker headgasket.. Could be a number of things.

Cam timing does make a difference to the comp ratio.

oh ok, well im pretty sure that the timing was on 22degrees when comp test was done, i have taking it back to 20degrees, so maybe it may be a litle lower/higher this time?

which way?

Tim

Um, cam timing, not ignition timing. If you want to check the cam timing you need to take the belt cover off & check that the marks on the belt match the marks on the pulleys.

oh sorry, ha ha

how would one go about adjusting the cam timing.... can it be adjusted or do i need to get another timnig belt or something?

Beef

OK just went and got the compression re-tested.....

1. 145psi

2. 150psi

3. 150psi

4. 145psi

5. 150psi

6. 150psi

so i dont know what the other F**K head was doing, maybe he tested when cold or something....

so does this sound like a better number....

maybe it will improve when i do the oil change that is past due..... and also flush it out..

what you think...

check the pic, its my baby gettin checked... :P

compcheck.bmp

Nothing wrong with 150psi odd.

It was probably just the other bloke guage and or didn't give it wide open throttle.

or... maybe he wanted to rebuild your perfectly fine engine. :D

OK just went and got the compression re-tested.....

1. 145psi

2. 150psi

3. 150psi

4. 145psi

5. 150psi

6. 150psi

so i dont know what the other F**K head was doing, maybe he tested when cold or something....

so does this sound like a better number....

maybe it will improve when i do the oil change that is past due..... and also flush it out..

what you think...

check the pic, its my baby gettin checked... :P

Nothing wrong with 150psi odd.

It was probably just the other bloke guage and or didn't give it wide open throttle.

or... maybe he wanted to rebuild your perfectly fine engine. :P

yeah maybe he wanted to make himself a few extra bucks.... but to eliminate teh chance of a dodgy mechanic i actually watched them do it and saw the results with my own eyes...

oh and..... what you mean by they probably didnt give it wide open throttle, they dont start the engine, they only turn it over 4 times....... its never actually running.....

Beef

oh and..... what you mean by they probably didnt give it wide open throttle, they dont start the engine, they only turn it over 4 times....... its never actually running.....

Beef

Ofcourse it wont start the engine, it has no coils or spark plugs - what he means is that the throttle is flat to the floor. Apparently this is the correct way to do it, otherwise you will get incorrect readings.

Ofcourse it wont start the engine, it has no coils or spark plugs - what he means is that the throttle is flat to the floor. Apparently this is the correct way to do it, otherwise you will get incorrect readings.

um der freddy........

the way he said it sounded like he was talknig about a dyno test or something.....

WOT will allow air to enter the cylinder easier and free'er which is why the results are more accurate. not doing the test at WOT may give you readings of 10-15psi less which is what i've noticed in the past.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...