Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some time ago we back to back tested Castrol FR 5W30 and 10W60 in a race engine (not an RB) on the dyno. Sure the race engine was built “loose” compared to a brand new “standard” road engine, but probably no looser than a 100,000ks’ old road engine. On the dyno there was very little difference in power output at all rpm ranges, with the 5W30 slightly ahead. But in real world conditions I don’t think you would ever notice the power or fuel consumption differences.

So I have continued to use the 10W60 in my road cars (and race cars) for the temperature safety margin it gives me.

:kiss: cheers :rofl:

PS; I didn't notice any significant oil pressure differences at normal operating temperatures, the oil pressure relief valve controls that.

Edited by Sydneykid

With the 5w40 Motul gear, over 3500rpm its a smidge under 6kgcm2... I should walk out to the car and have a look what units the std guage use.. lol

SK, to back up what you are saying I have seen on the net somewhere a dyno back to back with different oils in a subaru turbo thing, the castrol 10w60 actually made more power than some of the other lighter weight oils (splitting hairs type results, but none the less it wasn't less power), if I remember correctly better than the majority of 5w40/5w50 oils with the only one beating it being the mobil 1 0w40.

I would have kept running the 10w60 but was concerned with such high oil pressure, I must admit fuel economy is the same between oils.

Just cruising at 100km/h it was sitting damn close to 6kgcm/2 vs the 5w40 that sits on roughly 4.5..

Busky2k, I remember when whatsisname was running the motul 300v 10w40 in his close to 300rwkw rb25, he ended up moving to the 300v 15w50 as the 10w40 was not cutting it, how he knew this im not sure.

PS; I didn't notice any significant oil pressure differences at normal operating temperatures, the oil pressure relief valve controls that.

Yes very true , but it really depends on the engine too. Some go into relief just off idle. Others don't until 5000rpm etc. So different viscosities behave differently between engines. For example a 10W60 might go into relief at 4000rpm, but a 10W30 in the same motor might not go into relief until 6000rpm. So the latter oil would provide more flow for the same pressure.

Whilst the fuel economy benefits between thick and thin are small, they are definitely there but we're not talking say a trend you could see just over 1 tankful. For example, an ILSAC GF-4 rated oil must show 2% (IIRC) better fuel economy than a refererence fully synthetic 10W30. Moreover, many manufacturers in the USA are moving to 5W20 purely for fuel economy reasons. I believe people who would benefit the most from a thinner oil is one who does frequent short trips, where the cold viscosity differences between a 10W60 and a 10W30 are very large.

However I wouldn't say a thick oil would make you loose power compared to a thin on the dyno as the differences are down to the margin of error.

Cheers :D

Edited by Busky2k

Ive been using castrol R 10w 60 in my 33 since compliance...its only had 1 oil change so far at 5000kms ( due for the next 1 in about 2-3000km).

on startup, the pressure is at 3/4 of the stock gauge (6). when its warmed up and driving, it sits right on 4, and when stopped at the lights etc, it goes to 2.

None of that means anything to me, just thought i'd put it up for those who know what they're talking about.

justin911 uses the same oil, and his gauge shows those same readings in his 33 as well :D

personally i think 5000kms is too many between changes. but i am a catious mofo when it comes to maintenence as i punish the ring out of my cars i like to look after them as best i can in every other respect.

  • Like 1
Ive been using castrol R 10w 60 in my 33 since compliance...its only had 1 oil change so far at 5000kms ( due for the next 1 in about 2-3000km).

on startup, the pressure is at 3/4 of the stock gauge (6). when its warmed up and driving, it sits right on 4, and when stopped at the lights etc, it goes to 2.

None of that means anything to me, just thought i'd put it up for those who know what they're talking about.

justin911 uses the same oil, and his gauge shows those same readings in his 33 as well :D

My oil pressure is quite a bit higher than that, my oil pump is 'supposed' to be an rb25det pump.

First thing in the morning no matter what oil I use its up over the 8, well the only oil that was around 7.5 was the 10w30 castrol.

The idle is it sits on 2.

  • 4 weeks later...

lots of talk about pressure not much on viscosity...look at the cSt ratings of the 10W60 etc...compared with the 10W30...cold start is miles different...which is when 90% engine wear occurs.

on top of that a wide spread oil will need ot be changed more often due to the VII content to get the spread...never go past the POE stock oils such as redline and Motul 300v for example.

you op. temp visc. ratings will be similar in a 30 or a 40 60 is probably quite thick still...but the cold start is where u have a gain.

my 2 cents.

lots of talk about pressure not much on viscosity...look at the cSt ratings of the 10W60 etc...compared with the 10W30...cold start is miles different...which is when 90% engine wear occurs.

on top of that a wide spread oil will need ot be changed more often due to the VII content to get the spread...never go past the POE stock oils such as redline and Motul 300v for example.

you op. temp visc. ratings will be similar in a 30 or a 40 60 is probably quite thick still...but the cold start is where u have a gain.

my 2 cents.

for those that dont understand technical stuff, were you saying 10w 60 is good or bad?

is there any reason too high oil pressure is bad? mine is up at 85-90psi at idle when stone cold, and drops to 40-50psi at idle when warm, then hits around 80psi on full rpm under load. its a jun oil pump though, and im running the castrol 10w60 edge as well. it this just because of the relief valve spring being stronger in jun pumps?

is this a benefit ive got such good oil pressure or is there a downside to it?

Edited by CruiseLiner

I cant begin to tell you how good the formular R range is. used the 10w-60 on my GTiR and every single change on my GTR. every 3-5000kms. the 10w-60 is designed for high stress engines. wouldnt you agree that a GTR is a stressful piece of equipment.. therefore since i like pushing my GTR to 9000rpm (katimoto chipped ecu) i think ill use the formula R.

I actually put the formular R EDGE in on sunday and immediately i noticed that it became smooth and quieter again like a tammed lion. maybe its my mind talking but i think the edge is improved it does say so on the bottle. I think ill always use the 10w-60 it only costs me $55 a bottle. and i give my GTR more throttle than brakes. I highly recommend it.

Keep in mind a good oil filter is needed too. DONT USE VALVOLINE. im using a RYCO filter which cost $11 at repco (DICKHEADS). ill be using genuine Nissan Filters next time.

hope that helps u sway ur mind. BTW its not too thick IMO

Mark.

I cant begin to tell you how good the formular R range is. used the 10w-60 on my GTiR and every single change on my GTR. every 3-5000kms. the 10w-60 is designed for high stress engines. wouldnt you agree that a GTR is a stressful piece of equipment.. therefore since i like pushing my GTR to 9000rpm (katimoto chipped ecu) i think ill use the formula R.

I actually put the formular R EDGE in on sunday and immediately i noticed that it became smooth and quieter again like a tammed lion. maybe its my mind talking but i think the edge is improved it does say so on the bottle. I think ill always use the 10w-60 it only costs me $55 a bottle. and i give my GTR more throttle than brakes. I highly recommend it.

Keep in mind a good oil filter is needed too. DONT USE VALVOLINE. im using a RYCO filter which cost $11 at repco (DICKHEADS). ill be using genuine Nissan Filters next time.

hope that helps u sway ur mind. BTW its not too thick IMO

Mark.

Nissan oil filter cost me just tad over 9 bucks at dealer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...