Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey ppls :thanks:

I was playing around near the starter motor today and right near it theres a bunch of 3-4 cables tied together.. One of the cables seems to have this yellow looking round sensor hanging off the end of it ??

It kinda looks like a cylinder and its got a hole in the middle.. Its about 3cm tall and 2cm wide or so..

There isnt much slack on the cable so im pretty sure it goes somewhere near the starter motor area.

My cars not having any issues or leaking anything etc, but it just seems odd theres a part just sitting there not plugged into anything ??

My engine was rebuilt a few months back so im thinking maybe someone forgot to plug it back in, woteva it is ??

Oh yeah im pretty sure its not some electrical connector.. cause ya theres no connection part on it...

I know my description isnt very good but hopefully someone knows what im on about.. :D I'll try take a pic of it tommorow.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123611-some-wierd-sensor-or-something/
Share on other sites

i just had a look in nissan fast for a picture of a knock sensor...

assuming the picture is accurate the knock sensor looks like it kinda screws in somewhere (kinda like the o2 sensor from the looks of it) this thing looks like it just plugs in somewhere though.

Its not just the round plug that kind of screws in to the knock sensor? Or is there clearly a big arsed sensor hanging down?

With regards to the oil pressure sender... I've seen a few different colours, red, yellow and blue. I have a blue one. :)

I've attached a picture of the drivers side of the motor.

You can see the knock sensors as they have a little green lug. This is very close to the starter motor.

The plugs are obviously a nice little round plug that kind of screws on.

The motor obviously had a tad blowby, as you can see the oil stained the center 3 ports slightly, this would indicate the center 3 ports receive a tad more air than the front and rear.

I guess this could relate to the plenum flow thread. :P

post-382-1151195589.jpg

nah not the oil sender, i know which one that is and shes definietly plugged in.

It looks like it might plug into the knock sensor... on the knock sensor do they they have a little bit in the middle ??? sorta like a male connector... and then the part that plugs into (thing im on about maybe) has the female part... ?

one last thing :P should i be able to easily plug her back in if it is the knock sensor or am i going to need to pull heaps of crap off to access it :) ??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...