Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just so you know my Skyline went bang. Anyway they have pulled my engine out and it's in pieces at the moment, I haven't actually seen it yet but my mate who was at the w/shop yesterday said he was speaking with the owner of the w/shop about my car and they are going to offer me a deal on a forged rb30 bottom end. Mick (owner) wants me to ring him tomorrow. So... pros and cons on an rb30 bottom end on a rb25? What are they? When I find out what this deal is I'll let you know, as well as cost price. Are there any questions I should be asking tomorrow arvo when I speak with Mick?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123678-rb2530/
Share on other sites

thanks for that :) mods include:

G-Max Wheels rear: 18x9.5 with 265’s front: 18x8.5

Tein hight and rebound adjustable suspension

Full 3inch custom exhaust with Magic Cat and twin Mufflers

T04 turbo on X-Force highmount manifold

Turbosmart 48mm Pro-Gate wastegate

100mm think Front Mount Inter Cooler

Blitz blow off valve

Sard fuel pressure Regulator

Sard 550cc injectors

Walbro 500 horsepower fuel pump

Motec Enginge Management System

Exceedy 5 puck clutch

Pod air filter

Oil catch can

Thermo fan

Bonnet vents

Isotta Steering wheel

DBA 4000series sloted disks alround with braided lines

Braided fuel-line, blow-by, breather and radiator overflow hoses

New chrome radiator overflow tank

Gates Racing radiator hoses

Viper 790VX Pager car alarm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123678-rb2530/#findComment-2283856
Share on other sites

Owning an rb30det the only real cons are:

1. They need a rather large turbo for them to rev out, something along the lines of a GT35R .82 BUT it must have an aftermarket exhaust manifold other wise the exhaust manifold causes power to nose over around 5500-6000rpm.

2. Engine height, if you don't want to lower the motor you must drop on a greedy or gtr style plenum.

3. Legality..

There are no other cons, fuel economy is the same and its so so much nicer to drive around. Off the line lunge is rather impressive, so there's no more playing catchup. :D

I would say do it.. The cost of rebuilding a rb30 is the same as an rb25. The only added cost is the oil feed to the vct and IF you decide to lower the motor. I had some one reweld my engine mounts for $70. So the extra costs over an rb25 are I'd say well within $200.

If you run a GT30 or a turbo around that size you can expect a power curve similiar to the attached dyno graph.

As you can see peak power is made so much earlier in the rpm, power goes flat then noses over a little earlier than the rb25.

An RB30DET running the gt35r .82 still has more power downlow from 1000-3500rpm than an rb25det (stock turbo, 11-13psi, pfc, exhaust, fmic) making a peak of 190-200rwkw.

Your T70, a bit of a stab I would say the spool threshold will drop from ~4000rpm to low 3000's + you will see some boost much earlier in the rpm.

post-382-1151319446.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123678-rb2530/#findComment-2286664
Share on other sites

The actual motor rebuild is EXACTLY the same as what it would cost to do an rb20, rb25 or rb26.

Rods are cheap and plenty full as vlt's have been around for a long time, pistons, grab a set of cp's.

The only added cost I saw was $70 for the engine mounts, I ran the r32 rb25de head that has no vct so no costs involved there.

Bl4ck32 and I had our bottom ends done at the same time so we received a slight discount, so not really comparable.

The bottom end completely assembled with forged pistons and head fitted inc. parts was ~$4000.

We purchased a r32 rb25de head for $750 and had it rebuild + a little work (usual valve deshroud, mild port & cleanup, bronze valve guides etc). The rebuild and work cost $1100 inc. parts.

We then had to fit it which was as easy as pie. :D

I'm really happy how the rebuild has turned out, both motors return awesome fuel economy, don't use oil and best of all.. They haven't blown up. :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123678-rb2530/#findComment-2286716
Share on other sites

one bad point is the fact it dont rev like a 26, but it doesnt have to, to make the same power.

each to there own, but sometimes a quick and high revving engine is a great combo :P

different horses for different courses :D

im planning on building a stock rb30 bottom end with a 26 head very soon for my overweight stagea.

then the big revving 2.7 stroker can be put in a nice light track car for thrashing, mmm 10k rpm+ :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123678-rb2530/#findComment-2287173
Share on other sites

If you fit an ati balancer and ensure you fit the full oil pump crank drive the rb30's flick to 8500rpm odd. Which is well within a reliable valve train, much more and the valve train begins costing big $.

With regards to how quick the 3ltr rev's, I find the 3ltr free rev most definitely flicks through the rev's a lot quicker than my old rb20, a mates rb25 and one rb26 i've seen.

The rb20/25 and 26's rev up a little dougy sounding compared to the crisper sounding rb30. My rb30 is running lighter than factory forged pistons so it may be so that the lighter piston makes up for the slightly heavier longer rb30 rod.

Once on boost the 3ltr will rev quicker due to greater torque.

Listening to Sky30's on the dyno is a testament to this, the rev's once boost came on simply flicked and sound awesome, brrrraapp compare that to another rb25 making 300rwkw brrrrrraaaaaaaapppp and it appeared to actually rev slower... As it would as its making less torque.

:)

I believe 88Silloute has a nice little vid.. now if thats considered slow reving.......

Its simply an old stock n/a rb30 with a 25 head, exhaust manifold and trust turb making somewhere between 200 and 240rwkw I forget exactly. I remember he mentioned the limter was 7200rpm.

http://kero.drifthost.com/videos/marks4doo...nout.Winner.wmv

Suitable turbo + a nice exhaust manifold and the rb30's do rev like buggery.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/123678-rb2530/#findComment-2287191
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...