Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some GTS-t's came with those ---- You could try asking an importer or parts importer like www.justjap.com or similar for them.

I also know a few japanese manufacturers make totally clear ones (without the orange bit) ive got them in a catalogue here from TAS, but i've got no idea where you'd get them.

im selling them as they were in the boot of my car when i got it along with heaps of other crap which i wont be using, they have been used as they arent in brand new condition but there are no cracks or nothing so they are in good nick.

i lied about the globe being orange, i just had another look at them and its the surround of the globe thats orange, it does look possible that you could remove the cover and then remove that small inner orange part that surrounds the globe, then just either use an orange globe or if you wish a clear one and it will look the same as those in the photo's you supplied.

Shaun

aybee... believe it or not, the clear ones are the cheapest ones you can buy :D

then comes the clear ones with the lil yellow bump...

and the most expensive are the GTR ones (full yellow)

Interestingly the full yellow ones are around $90 for the left and $70 for the right from nissan in japan... don't ask me why... think its coz most ppl take out the left one for air circulation up there hehe.

I was askin around bout gettin clear lights... and one of the guys from japan told me that ppl who had clear indicators were considered lame and that everyone tried to get the gtr lookin ones.

that is very odd about the prices!

well im waiting arrival of my 32 which has gtr rims, wing and very yellow indicators (which i assumed were standard but maybe not). i didnt think about them till i saw a couple of clear ones and remembered that id always been a fan, on any car. i dont care about losing the gtr look cause, firstly, its not and secondly im changing the rims and eventually removing the wing anyway. although i have to admit, i want a gtr front bar - more bump/gutter friendly than the current bomex bar :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...