Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Me and my mate adam were thinking about a couple (Im keeping mine a secret :mellow: )

J4P4T4K Jap Attack <----- LOL

FLYNSKY Flying Sky

SKYFLYN Sky Flying

R332NV R33 To Envy

R342NV R34 To Envy

S1D3W4YS Sideways

UDLOSE You'd Lose

W1NN3R Winner

334LVN 33 for lovin

344LVN 34 for lovin

H4X0RS Hackers

DR33FT Drift

BRUTLSKY Brutal Sky

K33PUP Keep Up

B00STT Boost Twin Turbo

R34P3R Reaper

R33P3R Reaper

Some Funny ones

BGHRUNG Big Hrung

P3NI3XT Penis Extention

HUG3W4NG Huge Wang

couple are stupid, we were just stuffin around with em..

Edited by Hypn0tiK

I agree the NV series is a little bit "done to death". If you want to represent fast or something, [FAST33] [KWIK33] [FASTA33] [RACIN33] there could be heaps.

Sam none of the ones i have mentioned are taken, you are welcome to them if you like them. I was going to use [sKYRINE] but went with something else instead. They will look good if the licensing department ever actually gets them to me!!! 4 to 6 weeks my as* !!

Regards

RDirty3

COPBAIT?

When they pull you over it'll just prove your point :(

haha frost i like this one, unfortunatly i am cop bait no matter what car i drive, im almost ninteen but i look 9 lol, i get stopped just about every day, cops think im a joyrider or sumthin :(

hey all cheers for all the good suggestions, 'r dirty 3' you have some really good ones, now i cant make up my mind :D ,

many of you have said that you would rather spend the money on mods, i couldnt agree more but seeing as im not paying for them i look at it as free lol, and plus my dad was already shoked at how fast the skyline was stock compared to my civic, the last thing he would want to spend money on is making it faster, i wish that wasnt the case but meh!!! haha

yeh the suggestions are good guys cheers, keep em cumin if you can :)

sam

HAHAHA i was waiting for a suggestion like that :D , yeh i get the teased sometimes from people who find out just about every thing including the actual skyline was bought by my dad, but i dont mind :) lol i mean, wen my dad came up to me and asked if i wanted a skyline what was i supposed to say 'NO DAD i like my 1.5 civic' haha

Hehehe, awesome dude, gratz on the upgrade 2.

p.s my sis drives a civic 1.8 red, and just upgraded to a S2 1997 White r33 gtst :D:mellow:

I converted her..

Ill get her to make membership soon, as she gets her manual licence :D

Bit off topic sorry.

hmm numberplates

[NI554N] lol how original

[EIGHTEATR] - piss alot of ford and holden maniacs off :)

Edited by Hypn0tiK

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...