Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

because the gearboxes between NA and Turbo are different...

hence a lot more little things need changing.

If the NA gearbox could be retained (i dont know how long it would/could last)

theoretically, you could just unbolt the engine from the gearbox, unplug all the wiring and accessories and undo the engine mounts and lift the engine out. replace it with det engine (using your old NA engine mounts) swap the ecu and fuel pump with ones from a 25det. rig up the intercooler and drive away...

i suggest you try and find out if keeping the r33 NA gearbox isnt a crazy idea first - could save a lot of money and extra work.

I was lucky to have DamqikGTST who lives only a few doors down offer his help (wouldnt have attempted it without him).

It wouldnt take long to do in a workshop with a hoist etc

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok back to the topic of supercharging(sorry to interupt) funkey monkey put forward this conversion.the easiest supercharger to bolt on is the Toyota 1GZE SC. Its made for a 2.5L straight 6 (or was that 2.0L) the only thing you have to do is get a custom manifold fabricated. Smack on an GTR intercooler and a cold air intake and you've got a 50% power increase.

would anyone have a rough idea on what this would cost.....can get a decent sized fmic for like 500 so what would the other prices be??

lol that's exactly what i was gonna do (b4 i decided to get the GTR)

manifold costs about $800 to fabricate from scratch. Supercharger costs about $250 from a local wrecker. Intercooler will set you back about $800 or so for a GTR intercooler. Add about $500 for labour and piping. and ther's ya supercharged skyline, ready to much stock GTSt's 4 breakfast :P

neoGT-25

jus readign back... u sed insurance stopped u from turbo'ing... i think insurance companies stop you from forced induction... which includes supercharging.

an SC like the 1GZE SC wouldn't affect the internals mucly, its like putting the stock turbo on a GTSt onto the engine, its sorta built to withstand it. As for exhaust n stuff, you'd have increased back pressure, but you don't new headers or anything, coz its a sc

you need to relocate the airconditioning system, that's about it. doesn't take much. One of my mates who's a mechanic drew up a diagram where it goes almost in the same spot as the turbo, its feasable... i'd scan it but i dunno where i put the scrap piece of paper.

it does sound like a more unique option and a bigger "WOW" effect ......

ok .... so we've heard all the "goods" about sc option, what about the down sides to the sc option???apart from costs.... will the engine deteriorate faster then a turboed car, cos its not really made for forced induction?? or are the extra stresses put on the NA engine still within the NA'z limits???

also back to the gear box disscussion....... i gots an 96' R33 ser.II GTS4, hows the gear box in those cars??.. are they the same as the RB25DE(RWD) n RB20DE????.... i just thought being a 4WD car it might be stronger???? maybe?? i dunno????

Originally posted by funkymonkey

...............As for exhaust n stuff, you'd have increased back pressure, but you don't new headers or anything, coz its a sc

so does this mean u might need to down size the exhaust???

sorry if this sounds like a stoopid question.......my bad:rolleyes:

dunno about compression changes, I gave up investigating it when I decided to buy the GTR...

No what I meant is, as the SC setup didn't affect the way my extractors worked, (Ie have exhaust run thr the turbine like a turbo) I could keep the extractors that I already had. I already have aftermarket Fujitsubo extractors on mine worth about 1.5k so I'm not too keen on gettin rid of em. Hence why I was lookin at SC's coz they're less complicated and need less modifications than a turbocharger.

If you really want, buy my car and I'll help u supercharge it :)

u might need to upsize the exhaust, just like if you were puttin a turbo on.

A supercharger does the EXACT same thign a turbo charger does, except a supercharger is driven by a belt attached to the engine, and the Turbocharger is driven by exhaust gasses spinning the turbine.

Everything else is the same, you still need an intercooler to cool the air b4 induction (altho on an SC its not essential), and you still need a bigger exhaust to get rid of the increased byproducts of combustion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The incentives are mostly the same, yes. Ethanol is cheap compared to the cost of doing 98-100 RON with crude oil alone. 87 to 93-94 AKI all with E10. In 2020 Canada mandated E10 as a part of their "renewable fuel standard" and is supposedly going to go to E15 in 2030. In California where there are only 8 refineries with two threatening to shut down next year it's been over 20 years now of E10 and 91 AKI maximum because there's just not enough refinery capacity or crude oil supply relative to the demand for premium unleaded fuel. And CARB's low carbon fuel standard means functionally none of the diesel available at the pump is made from crude oil anymore. It's almost all entirely 20% biodiesel blended with 80% renewable diesel (hydrotreated vegetable oil) now. The number of gasoline vehicles that support E15 or higher ethanol concentrations is surprisingly low, I can't imagine it being wise to play tricks like this without flex fuel sensors in most of the fleet.
    • It's almost certainly the same as the one next to it. Have a fish around amongst these hits https://www.google.com/search?q=surface+mount+transistor+m33&sca_esv=9cb49794e0b2005d&source=hp&ei=2vJ5aNjTB7Kw0PEPldnS8QM&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaHoA6qkfmF6XcygtrZ4Vu9f92NXF_RFd&ved=0ahUKEwjYqIPP7MWOAxUyGDQIHZWsND4Q4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=surface+mount+transistor+m33&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhxzdXJmYWNlIG1vdW50IHRyYW5zaXN0b3IgbTMzMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjKCFAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAHfAaAB3wGqAQMyLTG4AQPIAQD4AQL4AQGYAgGgAuYBmAMAkgcDMi0xoAfMBLIHAzItMbgH5gHCBwMyLTHIBwU&sclient=gws-wiz
    • South Australia, which is hardly as far behind as the rest pf Oz makes out, and who is also not a paragon of progressiveness (read that as over-legislation) in the area of vehicle standards, has this to say on the subject: Adjustable coil-over suspension Aftermarket adjustable coil-over suspension components are suspension units that incorporate an external thread on the main body and corresponding threaded spring saddle that allows the vehicle's suspension height to be varied. If fitting aftermarket or coil-over suspension components you must submit an Application to modify a light motor vehicle form and a report from a light vehicle engineering signatory (LVES).
    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
×
×
  • Create New...