Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Gradenko

Before anyone tries this and gets into trouble, WD40 and AFMs do not mix well! Use electronic contact cleaner (1st choice) or carby cleaner (2nd choice).

I remember a previous thread on this and carby cleaner was said to be a no no as it leaves a residue. Brake cleaner was recommended and I have used this on my AFM with no issues and a noticeable improvement. Always have to be gently with the AFM though, and take it off the car before cleaning, don't go spraying this stuff up your intake.

Strich9: I had the same problem and was told by several workshops its very common with these cars, the ECU retards the timing when higher boost is applied which leaves a big flat spot as was evident on my dyno sheet.

Solution: run lower boost or add an Apexi Power FC :D

Trust me here people! The RB25DET boost cut is a voltage commanded signal that occurs independant of a FIXED boost limit! I.E - it may be 12psi,14psi or even as low as 10psi if the ambient air temp is low enough (& therefore air density is high enough). IT IS NOT A FIXED BOOST LIMIT SET INTO THE ECU!

Both the ECU commanded timing retard & boost cut limit are based on the voltage signal from the AFM (I imagine this would be close to 5.0V) These two voltage based limits don't appear to occur @ the same time from my experiences.

As I explained in my post above the sudden rush of intake air when you go to WOT will very easily cause the voltage from the AFM to exceed these voltage limits. The more air into your engine via improved breathing (i.e intake, FMIC, more boost etc etc..) the more these cuts will occur.

As Gradenko mentioned a quick fix for this is an FCD, not a great device but it works. Personally I'd steer well clear of this method.

The only 100% fool proof way around it is to bite the bullet & get some form of aftermarket ECU. Or run less boost :D

Having mentioned all this I have seen some GTS25t's (ALL 95 models too!) that seem to be uneffected but either of the stock ECU's boost or timing AFM voltage limits.

I was using a Unichip (that performed the task perfectly - up to a point) & this gave me a 13-14psi boost cut free power curve that was spot on till redline. It wasn't until I fitted & set-up an adjustable exhaust cam gear that the dreaded timing retard started to rear its ugly head again, I say 'again' because my car displayed these cuts as soon as I began to mod. With the cam gear I picked up 10rwkw & 3 HUGE (one almost 30rwkw) power drops (flatspots when on the road) This could literally be seen as the ECU pulled huge amounts of timing out each time this happened, & the dyno curve was like a mountain range! :) I didn't however have any boost cut issues occuring? Maybe because I'd removed the factory boost solenoid long ago?

Fast foward to today & I now get around this issue by having removed my AFM completely :) I run via MAP vs throttle position - & I love it! Hard to go past the well proven PFC, but if you like to do things a bit different & get the right people to assist in the process PFC alternatives can be very good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
×
×
  • Create New...