Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

without engine management or any ability to the tune car its pointles really. i would recommend just selling the guage and moving on with things.

that aside if you really must get one then you need to get the sensor. bosch have them as to do ngk and most other car electronics stockists. the sensor will be around the 400 mark ish and it could be more for the controller unit. ie: i dont think you can connect it directly to the af guage. and if u do get youll need to either tap a new bung in the exhaust dump pipe to mount it. if you replace the stock one with it, the factory 02 feedback wont work, so fuel economy will suck the wang, some controllers may have a narrow conversion which u could run to the stock ecu.

This is a old post but ,

Re: [oz-diy-wb] Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

michael_spiegle wrote:

>

> I was searching through the archives for infomation on the topic.

> I've heard that the Innovate Motorsports LM-1 is "much faster and more

> accurate" according to a couple people. I have used an Innovate box ...

Mike,

The "much faster and more accurate" statement applies to the LM-1 vs

most other wideband units EXCEPT the Tech Edge WBo2 range ...

Just so we could speak from an informed position, we "bit the bullet"

and finally got an LM-1 in November. We haven't actually had a lot of

time to look at it, but I'll make some general observations about

wideband meters first.

We HAVE seen "other" wideband products using LSU sensors and NTK

sensors. I hesitate to mention names (only from a legal perspective,

but I have made some comments that are in this list's archives). Some

of these wideband products, although nicely packaged and presented,

are absolute and total rubbish. The LM-1 is NOT rubbish and it does

work pretty much as advertised. It's packaged reasonably well, though

people say it's a bit large. Klaus is pricing it aggressively and it

seems to be selling well with all the advertising he pays for. At the

moment Tech Edge has taken a low key approach to selling and has

relied on word of mouth advertising.

Now for some comparisons with our unit - as we have a few different

models now, I'll mention the aspects that are common to all our rev 2

WBo2 units:

1. LM-1 uses a 10 bit DAC for it's linear output, Tech Edge use a 12

bit DAC. This is 4 times the resolution. Interestingly, both the LM1

and 2B0 use the Atmel AVR processor (Mega16).

2. LM-1 does not use the calibration resistor that comes with every

LSU sensor - therefore it MUST be calibrated each time a sensor is

swapped. Tech Edge correctly uses the calibration component in the LSU

sensors, and changing sensors (of the same type) does not require

free-air calibration to maintain a fairly good accuracy.

3. LM-1's in-built AFR display is hard to read.

4. Tech Edge has always had extra logging capability built into the

base unit.

5. Having a big calibrate button on the LM-1 invites people to

free-calibrate - this can result in inaccuracies unless the sensor

really is in free-air.

And, there are some things that the LM-1 does quite well. It has a

larger internal (on-board) logging memory, and it has the integrated

display which is handy for showing error messages. It's also field

upgradeable like our unit. In operation it has an aggressive heater

control algorithm and it provide a %o2 reading which we've never

thought was much use until last week when a potentially large

industrial user asked us to provide a linear %o2 output mapping for

WBlin (I will be providing this facility very soon via the next rev of

the CONF program).

Lastly, there are some "big" brand name wideband products that have

been around for quite a while (no need to mention names). I think some

of them, although they work reasonably well, are not good value for

money, and it would be good for someone, with the facilities, to do

some revealing back-to-back testing (no point asking me to do it -

who'd believe me ;-). Just for the record, we have a couple of ETAS

LA-4 units we use for comparison against our own units.

Summing up ...

> Does anyone have good information on 2B0 vs LM-1 in terms of performance?

I think it boils down to a purchasing decision between a good apple,

and a good orange, and trying to steer clear of the very tempting,

flashy, well advertised, but potentially expensive and not

particularly good performing, and poor value for money, bad lemons.

The final word ...

We've not been sitting on our hands since we developed the first 2A0

unit and then improved it with the 2B0 unit. We have come up with some

recent improvements that will result in some new products and

improvements to the existing range. But, 2A1 and 2B1 won't be out any

time soon, but we will have updates for some of our products in 2005.

To us, the technology and the results are more important than a flashy

go-fast look.

Peter.

te.

Fri Feb 4, 2005 4:16 am

Show Message Option

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

View Source

Use Fixed Width Font

Unwrap Lines

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Gargano <peter@...>

a1227ecm

Offline

Send Email

Forward Message #8155 of 10360 < Prev | Next >

Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

I was searching through the archives for infomation on the topic. I've heard that the Innovate Motorsports LM-1 is "much faster and more accurate" according to... michael_spiegle

Feb 4, 2005

12:40 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

michael_spiegle wrote: 8< 8< 8< ... Our units aren't open-source in the traditional sense (the firmware, in particular, is closed source and contains... Adam

adam_rx7sv

Feb 4, 2005

12:57 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

... 2B0 ... firmware, in particular, is ... try to make the hardware ... information available on the ... face of the earth ... a pretty good ... Hmm... oh... michael_spiegle

Feb 4, 2005

2:51 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

... Mike, The "much faster and more accurate" statement applies to the LM-1 vs most other wideband units EXCEPT the Tech Edge WBo2 range ... Just so we could... Peter Gargano

a1227ecm

Feb 4, 2005

4:13 am

Re: Discussion of Innovate Motorsports LM-1 vs TechEdge?

This is perfect!! Exactly what I wanted to hear. Thanks for an excellent explanation. ... box ... ... performance?... michael_spiegle

Feb 11, 2005

6:35 pm

< Prev Topic | Next Topic >

Message # Search: Advanced

YAHOO! SPONSOR RESULTS

Automotive Service Equipment - Garage equipment supply offers a full line of automotive repair equipment at affordable prices - free shipping, online shopping.

www.gesusa.com

Automotive Service Equipment - Automotive Service Equipment is a nationwide distributor of automotive equipment. Find the perfect products to enhance your repair shops efficiency and help you save money.

www.asedeals.com

NorthernTool.com: Automotive Equipment - Shop Northern Tool for discount prices on over 15,000 products.

www.northerntool.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright © 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy - Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I read this and thought "ah! I will do this scissor jack on the tow point thing!" I just use my floor/low profile/costco jack and lift the car up by the tow hook itself, then slide jack stands under. Never thought about using scissor into floor jack combo :p
    • Well, my new WMI system took much longer to finalize. I actually missed my dyno appointment last Friday and lost my 150$ deposit. I'll be going back in the next week or two.  To sum it up. I only kept the AEM tank from my old setup. I replaced the AEM pump with a higher flow/pressure ProMeth 30GPH pump. I also swapped over to a 6AN low pressure feed line to the pump from the tank. There's also a pressure switch you cannot see on the pump high pressure line.    This is feeding 6x 200CC direct port nozzles and 1x 500CC Pre Throttle body nozzle. All fittings are Swagelok, because well why not. I also have a 300PSI pressure sensor up front.    I now have my Haltech ECU controlling everything. I start my pump with a basic relay at 5PSI and deadhead it. I then PWM a 3000CC methanol Injector to control flow starting around 10psi. The pressure switch in the trunk, along with my tank level are safeties before I ever get to 10PSI, and then I use my pressure sensor upfront as a secondary safety to cut the WMI and corrections in case the injector blocks or a line ruptures.  Wish me luck on the dyno!    
    • So, I'm back with bad news. There's no jack long enough on this planet that will reach the front subframe. If by some chance there is, it would weigh 200lb's.  I purchased a long reach jack... The damn thing weighted 120lb's and was massive. Didn't even come close, was still short at least a foot. It was a pain, but I brought it back. Next I decided HA! No problem, I'll get an Extra long reach jack. Well, I couldn't lift the box... It must have weighed 160LB's and luckily there was an open box in store. I took measurement and was still nowhere close.  Sadly I've lost hope and have accepted defeat. 
    • Thanks for that tip, niZmO_Man. I think the battery is OK. It's quite a new one, but I'll check. Last time I needed a new battery, everything electronic was fine, except that there wasn't enough current to turn over the starter. I decided to order one of the partial AV system translation CDs from Car Audio Workshop in NZ. That might have some effect, or help me diagnose the date problem. 🤞
    • I suppose it was relatively stock too, the JZ motor handle most mods thrown at them without even breaking a sweat 
×
×
  • Create New...