Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats a series 1 motor. series 2 have a rounder tps, and it has 2 plugs (although both not always connected).

as for the series 1.5, they weren't a true model, but just a mix match. they have a series 2 wing, series 1 interior, series 1 bodykit, and most have a series 2 motor, drivers airbag as standard.

I would add;

My old S1 had a separate ignitor and a Garret turbo, with a ceramic turbine & steel compresor

It had the half moon CAS drive on the exhaust camshaft

It had one plug on the TPS

No airbags

Our S1.5 has ignitors on the coils and a Garret turbo, with a ceramic turbine & steel compressor

It's an M spec, so it has the high rear wing, front bumper and side skirts

I don't know what CAS drive it has

It has 2 plugs on the TPS, but only 1 is connected

Drivers airbag

The S2 I used for a month had ignitors on the coils and a Hitachi turbo, with a ceramic turbine & plastic compressor

It had a star shaped CAS drive on the exhaust camshaft

It had 2 plugs on the TPS and both were connected (from memory)

Drivers and passengers airbag

:no: cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

Post your VIN here and someone can tell you

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=128496

I know that the car has an Igniter and the afm was changer with the old rb20 one.

can any one tell me the year of the motor I can take more photos if wanted.

But he is trying to find out what engine model it is. How is knowing airbags etc. going to help to figure that out?

And RB_SANDY - WTF does it matter anyway? You should have more than enough information to work it out by now.

just because in the Rb25 Turbo Upgrade, All Dyno Results post some one says that the r33 series 1.5s are makeing the most power and I just whant no know what year it is.

Edited by RB SANDY
just because in the some one says that the r33 series 1.5s are makeing the most power and I just whant no know what year it is

You have got to be kidding me?

Should have put that in your first post so we can all say that its ridiculous.

They are so virtually the same that its pointless discussing it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...