Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Please add "Local areas in NSW" subforum to the NSW section and give all NSW mods rights to it.

As per the vote.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...p;#entry2390705

I will move all the threads into it if someone just creates it for me.

Please?

thanks.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, i honestly dont think its a good idea, its just going to divide SAU into groups (well, more so than it already is)

So far only 22 people have voted, lets wait a day or 2 and see how the poll looks then maybe?

heh, although a subsection is a lot cleaner than the rubbish in the NSW section now. we'll see how the polls go.

in general its a bad idea, because it just opens up more postwhore threads, and also segregates people. I can't wait to see a new thread for each suburb with a handful of posts each.

heh, although a subsection is a lot cleaner than the rubbish in the NSW section now. we'll see how the polls go.

in general its a bad idea, because it just opens up more postwhore threads, and also segregates people. I can't wait to see a new thread for each suburb with a handful of posts each.

Totally agree

And its not the postwhores asking for it, its actually quite the opposite, the people who arent regulars in that thread are the ones asking for it :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...