Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 422
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

nah I reckon having too wide variety of cars ruins it .... would be far better if we just restricted it to Skylines with the odd Silvia thrown in. Just my 2c.

Will, I have Paypal'd you the $10.

i agree so that makes 4c

As Platinum said, I know us VL Boy's would love to come along and have a bit of a comp.

Its up to you though, we will have a couple of 300rwkw + cars.

Possibly get our 450-500rwkw + car to come along.

And then mine <200rwkw car. Haha.

But we dont want to impose on anything.

Meh well if the mentality is that only force fed RBs are invited then I think thats a smidgen unfair! >_<

I mean people are entitled to run their car on the dyno even if its not really highly modded or not an RB yes? Its all fun in the end and thats what counts! OK well I have to admit if we had 10 Excels lined up I'd be rasing my eyebrow but we all know this doesnt happen on an SAU dyno day.

Edited by Busky2k
As Platinum said, I know us VL Boy's would love to come along and have a bit of a comp.

Its up to you though, we will have a couple of 300rwkw + cars.

Possibly get our 450-500rwkw + car to come along.

And then mine <200rwkw car. Haha.

But we dont want to impose on anything.

By any chance is that 450-500 rwkw a combined develop car of the VL Boy's? Or an individual by some chance that use to be red in colour? (Car color) I don't mind either way, but im aiming at 140-150rwkw, so you can kinda see my possible want to be first or early, possibly early so there isn't an anticlimax at the end with the more powerful cars >_<.

Cubes.......a 3L RB30ET into an R32 isn't something i'd call a small modification :) lol. A pod filter and exhaust maybe.... This is looking like a good day....

Edited by DC_GTST

im only saying 1 club assuming we would run out of time assuming there are moderate numbers 12 SAU members 12 VLT members that would take alot of time to run 2x dyno runs on 24 cars

i used 12 as a real conservative number might be more could be less

dont take it personal that i didnt want to mix groups im only thinking of time

Well there's no bending of the rules then...

If we are able to get a decent number 20odd (which it looks we already are) then its SAU only.

No Nissan silvia/calais turbo members that are not sau members etc..

Meh well if the mentality is that only force fed RBs are invited then I think thats a smidgen unfair! >_<

Don't take it personally... It wasn't meant to come across as such.

People like Platnium, chops, busky2k (may be some more I've left out) by all means are 100% welcome as they are what I consider SAU members. You know your all welcome anyway, as you are us... SAU... :)

Cubes.......a 3L RB30ET into an R32 isn't something i'd call a small modification >_< lol. A pod filter and exhaust maybe.... This is looking like a good day....

Its still running near stock boost and a small crappy turbo, so only mild. The motor has lots of torque but thats about it. No high rpm which I am really starting to miss. :)

The highlight of my day last dyno day was Sky30's rb30 and MS75 pushing out 391.1rwkw. Both sound awesome and seriously grunty.

i wanna see Jake's (tubbed1's) VLT on the dyno to see what that monster pushes, i also have a thing still for VLT's as i used to own one.

This is the car i'm talking about, i'm sure even the most bogun hating people could appreciate this!

1004374bz3hw9.th.jpg 1004376eb3mb1.th.jpg

I'll come along for a look - my car might still be down there then anyway.

And for my 2c I'd like to see the VLT boys come along too! I would suggest asking Shaun and Troy how many cars they can accomodate in a day (say 0900-1800) I would have thought ~25 cars would be achieveable.

I'll come along for a look - my car might still be down there then anyway.

And for my 2c I'd like to see the VLT boys come along too! I would suggest asking Shaun and Troy how many cars they can accomodate in a day (say 0900-1800) I would have thought ~25 cars would be achieveable.

(say 0900-1800)

cmon its a saturday they dont want to be there till 6pm >_< i know i wouldnt

(say 0900-1800)

cmon its a saturday they dont want to be there till 6pm >_< i know i wouldnt

Hence the reason I wrote, 'I would suggest asking Shaun and Troy...' I'm not saying they MUST stay open from 9am till 6pm or even 5pm. But at least ask them what 'they' are happy with.

I believe there my pictures man ^ Lol.

Jakes will push 450-500rwkw imo.

Will see, matters if were allowed to come along lol.

i believe they are, you don't mind me posting do you?

I had my own that i took at autosalon but i couldn't be stuffed making them smaller and yours were more handy! :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...