Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 422
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I've given it some thought, SAU members are given first preference. Please check the first post to see if your on the list, if your not please PM me with your interest to go, its a bit of a hassle now filtering though each post.

We will aim for 25 cars with a break in the middle. The order in which the deposits are given to me will determine where they are in on the day. (you can move around the order when I get things finalised)

If your not from the forum please pm me with your car details and I will see if we can fit you in.

Also please tell me if you have a FWD car, you will be first or last depending on how many FWD's need to be run.

Edited by gtrGhosTDoGG11

still going ahead?

im keen to, as since 31 club dyno day ive put a full 3" system on, got my actuator hooked up right and i'll b manual. keen to see if theres a major difference

I'm interested in supporting this dyno day, as with others in the past.

As this is a skyline board obviously I'll be happy to step aside if there are more skylines that need spots.

Dyno day is about the only chance my car has to get WOT at the moment.

By any chance is that 450-500 rwkw a combined develop car of the VL Boy's? Or an individual by some chance that use to be red in colour? (Car color) I don't mind either way, but im aiming at 140-150rwkw, so you can kinda see my possible want to be first or early, possibly early so there isn't an anticlimax at the end with the more powerful cars :(.

Cubes.......a 3L RB30ET into an R32 isn't something i'd call a small modification :P lol. A pod filter and exhaust maybe.... This is looking like a good day....

dude don't worry about it. my car is only gonna put out 145, im using this as a test to make sure my new fuel pump fixed my dangerously lean air fuel mixture. just use it as a learning experiance to find out what other people have tried and what works best etc.

Chops, you are from SAU and for a while too, doesnt matter what car you had, let me know if you want to run for sure so you can send a deposit.

Cheers.

Count me in then mate, I'll deposit some cash in your account.

I'm keen to come down and check it out. i wouldnt dare put my car on he dyno. Wouldnt want to bring a bad name to the R32 fans. As she is stock with just a cat back exhaust and pod. Woo i feel the power lol.

Im keen to come down and help out in anyway if thats cool.

Looking forward to seeing some of your cars on the dyno and looking at what i can do to get the most out of my engine

I'm keen to come down and check it out. i wouldnt dare put my car on he dyno. Wouldnt want to bring a bad name to the R32 fans. As she is stock with just a cat back exhaust and pod. Woo i feel the power lol.

Im keen to come down and help out in anyway if thats cool.

Looking forward to seeing some of your cars on the dyno and looking at what i can do to get the most out of my engine

Id rather have a stock car with rims like u got mate :mad: very nice...

Edited by Bl4cK32
I'm keen to come down and check it out. i wouldnt dare put my car on he dyno. Wouldnt want to bring a bad name to the R32 fans. As she is stock with just a cat back exhaust and pod. Woo i feel the power lol.

Im keen to come down and help out in anyway if thats cool.

Looking forward to seeing some of your cars on the dyno and looking at what i can do to get the most out of my engine

It's really not about making the most power, it's more about socialising with a group of like minded enthusiasts, discussing mods and their effects, and then getting the thirst for spending buckets more cash on your car!

Also, dyno days are generally the cheapest dyno run you will get, so it can serve as a good base line to gauge your improvements with future mods.

BBQ, you pay as you eat. Probably $1 a snag and some drinks available.

Been a bit busy havent had time to update the thread, will be updated tonight.

Thanks for the pm's about payments, keep them coming, the sooner we get to 20+ the less stress I'll have. =0

Darren,

What dyno did he run on the night before to read 50rwkw more????

From what ive seen, Shauns dyno seems to be fairly accurate.

Tilbrooks, 2 cars got tuned there the night before, one dropped 30rwkw to 230rwkw

one dropped 50+ 348rwkw from 405rwkw, they both weren't happy

cheers

'darren

Im sorry to tell you boys.

But those Work CR Kais arent mine. I was just lending my stockies to a mate to help him get his g/f's car off defect. I just love the picture so I use it. But as Chops said. I should chuck the 4dr on and see what it makes now. Then work from there. And the price is awsome.

Cheers and cya at the dyno day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...