Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok here's what i'm set on doing, fitting both (exhaust and inlet)hks adjustable cam gears to my series one (93) r33 rb25det

i know one goes on piece of cake but everyone leaves off the second, 1st question is why is that? and 2nd i know it is possible to get the other on i've heard of rb25's with it what has to be done?

i know the vct has to come off to make it fit, what happens from here?

Edited by teamplasma
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130154-adjustable-cam-gears-4-rb25det/
Share on other sites

i've heard such things bout no real gains, fact is i've got the cam gears and am doing the timing belt and a range of other things so it will be the "cheapest" mechanical time to fit them, besides trackside will soon be selling the clear cam covres so it's a bling thing too hehe

From my understanding is that people only fit the exhuast cam gear cause that's the one where you get some extra power from when tuned right, but if your just putting it on stock motor then yeah what R31nismiod said.

IMHO i would forget the camgears and just get tomei pon cams.

an adjustable cam gear is totally inferior to the std vct, the std vct adjusts on the fly so you get the best of both world(bottom end and top end gains) by changing it to a fixed position cam gear your gonna get only one or the other,

this is why no one changes it!

Edited by otto

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...