Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all.

as the title states, why does haveing the bore and stroke the same (or similar) size make it capable of reving high? if im wrong dont flame me cos this is just what I have been told. by a very knowledgeable bloke, so i believe him.

cheers guys.

james.

:laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130950-bore-x-stroke/
Share on other sites

yeah, i dont know if square (same bore as stroke) motors are rev happy, motors with less stroke than bore tend to be more like that. take RB26 VS 2JZ, the 2JZ being square, this is one of the reasons they hold together so much longer than the RB26, coz they dont really have to rev to make the power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130950-bore-x-stroke/#findComment-2422750
Share on other sites

Of course the bore x stroke is not a be all end all of how hard a motor can rev. (Note; the valvetrain design is also very important!) For example, the Honda B18C was actually undersquare, despite the fact that it revs easy to 8000rpm+.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130950-bore-x-stroke/#findComment-2422850
Share on other sites

motors with a very short stroke are capable of revving significantly harder than motors with equal bore/stroke, or longer stroke.

A motor with a long stroke, however is capable of producing more torque at a lower RPM.

This is why the SR20 makes MORE torque than the RB20 whilst having the same capacity.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130950-bore-x-stroke/#findComment-2424218
Share on other sites

i don't think there is a rule for stroke vs rpm. it partly comes down to the design of the rest of the motor. the cams and timing and valve ports, etc would play a role in it too.

but it is also a case of what the motor is being used for. if you have an engine that revs itself into next week, and want to use it for towing, it isn't going to be very good, but if you have an engine with a nice long stroke, then it is going to have bucket loads of torque so it will just chug along.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130950-bore-x-stroke/#findComment-2425014
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Haha no I'll do that one tomorrow. I've been ignoring it. It's the 5.0 one I'm taking about. (There is a little X to hide the 4.7 one if you want)
    • So I'm going to have to keep ignoring the 4.7 update, or whatever version it is? Poop. I was hoping you'd put me out of my misery.
    • We have a huge update coming in the next few months, version 5 of Invision will be released. I'm holding off any changes until after this change as I'm not sure what features will be removed or introduced.
    • Yeah, plenty of air flow, there is a dedicated path that feeds the air in to the OEM intake tube behind the bumper As for a "tangible effect", maybe, but getting the pod/intake air out of the hot engine bay is worth it psychologically to me, even if it gives no performance difference, so the tangible effect in my Lizard brain saysss yessss  In the end, to me a tangible effect isn't always about performance, sometimes it a sound or a look, or even a...... feeling  Ooga-Chaka Ooga-Ooga Ooga-Chaka Ooga-Ooga Ooga-Chaka Ooga-Ooga Ooga-Chaka Ooga-Ooga
    • yeah first and reverse is where you will find clutch release issues (whether hydraulic or mechanical) because the difference in revs required is the highest there; particularly changing down from 2nd to 1st when still moving. To be clearer though, it is possible that the clutch release bearing is the wrong height. This is less likely than a hydraulic issue but it is not unheard of when you are mixing and matching
×
×
  • Create New...