Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i think he his plan is that by removing the aircon he can run shorter cooler pipes so he has better throttle response.

what you have to take into consideration is that if you have the cooler pipes too short you tighten the bends, which makes the air have to change direction more suddenly. if that pic is of the setup ypu are trying to shorten, then there isn't much you can do before you start compromising air speed.

another option would be to fit a smaller cooler. removing 6 inches of cooler will reduce the air volume by more than removing 6 inches of piping.

How do you plan to achieve throttle response? Stop being so secretive :D

Not being secretive.

Untimately the aim is to keep the intercooler piping as short as possible and with as little bends as possible.

We can play around with intercooler sizes, end tank designs... the sky is the limit.

At the same time using chinese factories to keep the prices down but keep quality up to a good level (as seen with the bar and plate cores that people are using in 400+ rwkw cars).

We recently did a project for the VL guys which can be seen here: http://www.calaisturbo.com.au/showthread.php?t=78364 (the aim of that project was to keep the intercooler hidden aswell as avoiding any holes being cut in the chassis)

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
I'm not talking about losing the aircon due to the power loss. I'm talking about losing the aircon for space in the engine bay/front of the car.

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

You think that there wont be a noticable difference going from a Hyrbid style intercooler kit to the one I'm using in my R32? (or any other cooler kit that's remotely similiar)

I'm not talking about making kits for an SR in the skyline range as there is clearly enough room (as seen in my R32), but I'm asking to see how many people are actually using their aircon and how many people would lose it for a setup like this.

With the SR range of cars, it's not necessary to lose your air con.

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
umm. the ac compressor turns of at any major load any way :D

just the extra heat through the radiator youve gotta wory about. its gives NO LOSS OF POWER at all.

so just bask in the nice chilled enviroment lol

We're not talking in terms of power loss from the AC compressor.

We're talking in terms of space in the engine bay.

Greg

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

20cm's of pipe?

You'll be losing around 2 meters, aswell as around 600+ degrees worth of bends.

Thats still only .2 seconds

In theory, pollsibly...

One of the drift cars we used to sponsor (180/s15 front) had a FMIC install, it's now running a V mount setup and the difference in throttle response is incredible!! I can't time it, but you sure can feel the difference.

If the RB guys aren't interested in these sorts of kits, that's not a problem. We'll just make them for the SR's.

Greg

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :)

post-382-1156551019.jpg

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :(

I don't have any pictures handy, but the overall idea is to have the radiator sitting on a 45 degree angle and your intercooler sitting on a 45 degree angle, the overall the advantage is that the pipes are shorter, and neither your intercooler or radiator are getting less air flow. The disadvantage to this setup is heat soak.

Greg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...