Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have just done the first test session on semis i felt the car was a little loose in the back end any ideas on how to best make it stick just a little more.

I think that the spring rating maybe just a bit to firm and is picking up the inside rear enough to allow to brake traction.

Any comments will be well recieved. And i will pass the 997 turbo next time i swear.

regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/
Share on other sites

Have just done the first test session on semis i felt the car was a little loose in the back end any ideas on how to best make it stick just a little more.

I think that the spring rating maybe just a bit to firm and is picking up the inside rear enough to allow to brake traction.

Any comments will be well recieved. And i will pass the 997 turbo next time i swear.

regards

I need to know a few details before I can really make any meaningful suggestions;

1. Spring rates?

2. Shock brand?

3. Stabiliser bar size?

4. Stabiliser bar settings, if adjustable?

5. Wheel alignment settings?

6. HICAS or not?

7. Engine power?

8. LSD type and condition

That'll do for a start.

:) cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2440746
Share on other sites

I need to know a few details before I can really make any meaningful suggestions;

1. Spring rates?

2. Shock brand?

3. Stabiliser bar size?

4. Stabiliser bar settings, if adjustable?

5. Wheel alignment settings?

6. HICAS or not?

7. Engine power?

8. LSD type and condition

That'll do for a start.

:) cheers :O

Ok in answer to the replies yes i think the rear is far to hard and the spring rate will need to be lowered but i will follow due course as you guys have years more experience with these cars.

1. Hard, :( thats all i know they were on the car when purchased or rescued from scrap yard is a better term.

2. Ohlins all round non adjustable

3. standard front and back

4. N/A

5. Neutral toe settings front and rear, and 1mm neg camber on front and back and no caster adjust as standard items used.

6. Lock bar in use removed the HICAS

7. about 400 hp at fly guess though but would be close.

8. I dont know to be honest be i would assume factory.

Also i need to mention i am running semi's as mentioned but the car was not handle like this on the track day i ran a few months ago. I have installed a 7 point cage ( as mention in another forum ) could this have stiffened the car?

Edited by tacker
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441108
Share on other sites

As well as the spring rates, you might want to experiment with different turn in points (try later compared to other cars) and get an attesa controller and dial in more front drive than standard (they are pretty taily stock, later models addressed this with more front drive to some extent)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441430
Share on other sites

Ok i should have been a bit more imformative with my request.

Car was good coming out of corners as there are only 2 second gear corners the rest are either 3rd or one very quick 4th. The car was turning in well but would become loose in the rear mid corner with a nice consistant throttle and not just pushing it straight to the floor. And this was a constant right through out the 4 x 20 minute sessions no matter what lines i tried. I am sure it is either the swaybar or springs or even both. As it was the car was nice and consistant it just needed a bit more rear traction and it would be a much better car to push around a track.

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441744
Share on other sites

Ok in answer to the replies yes i think the rear is far to hard and the spring rate will need to be lowered but i will follow due course as you guys have years more experience with these cars.

1. Hard, :rolleyes: thats all i know they were on the car when purchased or rescued from scrap yard is a better term.

2. Ohlins all round non adjustable

3. standard front and back

4. N/A

5. Neutral toe settings front and rear, and 1mm neg camber on front and back and no caster adjust as standard items used.

6. Lock bar in use removed the HICAS

7. about 400 hp at fly guess though but would be close.

8. I dont know to be honest be i would assume factory.

Also i need to mention i am running semi's as mentioned but the car was not handle like this on the track day i ran a few months ago. I have installed a 7 point cage ( as mention in another forum ) could this have stiffened the car?

Suggestions follow;

1. You really need to know the spring rates, this thread shows you how to get the dimensions, then send them to me and I will work out the spring rartes for you.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=79157

2. I have never seen non adjustable Ohlins. Are you sure they are Ohlins? Are you sure that they are non adjustable? No knobs or allen key adjusters on the shock tops?

3 & 4. For regular circuit work you really should look at upgrading to adjustable stabiliser bars, that will enable you to tune the handling balance

5. For regular circuit work you really need around 2.5 to 4.0 degrees negative camber at the front and 1.0 to 2.0 negative camber at the rear. More caster (than standard) is even more essential, do yourself a favour and spend ~$120 and get a caster adjusting kit.

6. Good move

7. That's enough to get some power oversteer

8. OK

On to your observations. For mid corner oversteer, my first guess is the rear spring rate is too high, not unusual for a Japanese kit. Hence why you need to spend a few minutes and get those coil spring dimensions. If you had adjustable stabiliser bars you could have wound on a bit more front bar, that would have overcome the oversteer. Or wound off the rear bar, if it wasn't already at its softest setting.

You could try a little rear toe in, say 2 mm. That will help with the midcorner oversteer, but the downside might be poorer turn in response. It's simply a matter of trying it.

For driving technique, I would try a slightly slower corner entry and then use a little power at mid corner. This gives the front wheels a little torque which tends to pull the car straight. Not large lump of throttle, just a progressive squeeze, which will them give you a higher entry speed to the next straight.

Hope that has been of some help

:thumbsup: cheers :(

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2441837
Share on other sites

Cheers SK,

I am just about to get on a plane for Angola ( Lucky huh ) but i will do as you say as soon as i get back into Dubai.

I have read your thread on the sprind rates and i will post them to you ASAP. The shocks are ohlins but i will have to check the allen key bit.

Angain thanks for the help and i will order the castor adjust kit.

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131749-comment-please/#findComment-2442019
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • (Rb25det intake manifold) I’m having a hell of a time trying to find the full part or part number of this coolant hardline so far I was given these (Below) but they aren’t what I’m looking for and was told it’s the IAR or aac valve but that doesn’t seem to be it either. If someone could point me in the right direction it’d be greatly appreciated. Or if anyone has it for sale that’d be great too. I have recently purchased a greddy manifold and I can’t seem to find my old one to pull it off.  (Front Heater Return / Water Pipe (under intake): Primary part: 14053‑21U10 (front return pipe assembly for R33/R34 RB25DET) Alternative listing: 14053‑21U00 (same pipe, sometimes interchangeably referenced)   Heater Feed Pipe: Listed as 14075‑04U00 or feed-related variant 14053‑AG500)    
    • This sounds cool. But, as per usual, anything really complicated like that, that I take on, constitutes a steep learning curve that I never actually "learn". I just get it working, install it and start using it. Then, when it breaks a few months later, I've got no memory of what I did, how I did it, or even the bloody IP address I gave it. I'm having more or less exactly that problem right now. My Proxmox machine was discovered to be non-responsive, and the VMs on it were ditto. Power cycle it to a stream of loud Dell beep codes - which was unpopular at midnight, I can tell you. Move it to the lounge room so I can HDMI it to the TV for a screen, see the boot messages complaining about the /PVE/data having all sorts of LVM problems, saying it needs to be fixed manually. And I'm like....great. How am I going to work out what I need to do? At least it wasn't the stupid Silicon Power SSD shat itself. Mental note for all readers - DO NOT BUY SP SSDS! They are shit. I have had one take out an entire VM setup already, and this one could have done the same. Maybe it actually has. Cheap Chinesium shitbaskets. I won't cheap out again, even on play projects with no budget. Because my time budget having to fix shit is worth far more than the cost of proper parts.
    • I do typically agree. These days even the screens most people use have more of a boot time than the main device. However, I've seen an interesting use of the RPi in vehicle, however it involves effectively building your own OS and MBR, as then it boots up exceptionally quickly, as you don't have everything needing to start up, and you can then also run it up as an RTOS, while still having more compute than an Android can give for things like display, and processing. A very huge task that would be though for Duncan, I'm not sure that's his skill set (or Arduino programming and wiring) ha ha. If end goal is definitely just water cooling, Arduino would be the simpler setup especially for a rookie. If he wants extra display stuff though, bashing some code in Python on an RPi may be the better result for both systems.   Unfortunately the new device I'm building at work which runs a display, is too slow of a display for dashboard style purposes. More extreme low power, update only a couple of times a day type system
    • I don't like "actual computers" for in car use. They take time to boot up, have OS annoyances, and so on. Arduinos etc are ready to go a few seconds after power on, don't mind being agressively powere cycled, because everything is non-volatile, don't mind being shaken and stirred.
    • As Fred would tell us, it's all about interpreting the rules. It's not a water sprayer, it's a water mister... But everything else you've said, 100%! Even a raspberry Pi would be great, use HDMI out for a display, and add a raspberry Pi CANBus hat to read values out from the ECU.
×
×
  • Create New...