Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey,

not sure if anybody else here has really looked into the whole eccs (stock ecu) remapping side of things, but i've been giving it a bit of thought as of late. actually flashing and changing maps etc on the rom onboard the ecu is not much of a problem, but when it comes to tuning the only real way i've seen people doing it is to buy a rom emulator so that maps and other details can actually be changed on the fly, ie when the engine is running, and then flashing the rom when you're happy with the maps etc. The rom emulators are big bucks, and without one it becomes quite tedious as one has to flash the rom after every little detail they change, which would suck majorly. Doing it either of these ways i imagine it would be quite hard to do a proper map trace too.

anyway, i was looking through the consult protocol (http://www.plmsdevelopments.com/images_ms/Consult_Protocol_&_Commands_Issue_6.pdf#search='consult%20protocol') that plms developments have reverse engineered and noticed that all maps can be temporarily adjusted. with this in mind, i believe it would be possible through the consult port and after developing the right software (after watching dr drift i _think_ this is what he's working on) to emulate the entire operation of the ecu from a laptop and tune from that, thus eliminating the need for a rom emulator. this would also make map tracing a synch and could also be tied in with accurate o2 readings from a wideband to make sure everything is running fine.

the only real problems i can see with this setup is weather or not the speed of the consult bus and refresh rate would be enough to keep up with the engine..

anyhow, just after other peoples thoughts and experiences at this stage, perhaps something could be developed together making tuning for all us skyliners alot cheaper and easier.

i was also wondering on what people have done to keep the cvt enabled when implementing the r32 ecu on the r33 (the r33 ecu is alot more work to mess with as opposed to the 32 ecu)..

cheers,

mark.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/132134-a-few-thoughts-on-eccs-remapping/
Share on other sites

To my knowledge, the consult does not have the capability to change fuel map at different load points but rather a rough adjustment across the board. You can also change base timing but once again, not at different load points, only across the board. The EEPROM upgrade will still remain the best way to do it.

I am pretty sure Sam is still the only person who can remap 'on the fly' as well.

To make temporary adjustments permanant, you would need some type of laptop or computer device to continuously send data to the given addresses. This, in itself, would end up costing much more than just a remap.

good points, the consult doesn't have the ability to actually change the fuel maps, but this is where the whole emulation thing i should've been mroe clearer on comes into play. you can change the fuel / timing across the board, but with the consult you also have access to every sensor that the ecu has access too when it calculates which cell to use in each map, so theoretically all that would have to be done is to whip up a script that reads the inputs from the sensors and then reads the appropriate cells then adjusts the fuel/igintion/whatever to suit, just as the ecu would do itself. when tuning is complete one saves the image, removes the laptop from the consult port then flashes the rom in the ecu and bob's your uncle.. theorectically :(

To my knowledge, the consult does not have the capability to change fuel map at different load points but rather a rough adjustment across the board. You can also change base timing but once again, not at different load points, only across the board. The EEPROM upgrade will still remain the best way to do it.

I am pretty sure Sam is still the only person who can remap 'on the fly' as well.

To make temporary adjustments permanant, you would need some type of laptop or computer device to continuously send data to the given addresses. This, in itself, would end up costing much more than just a remap.

I can garuntee you that he is not the only person to make changes on the fly. Hasn't he only just worked out how to chip/emulate the s15? And no the standard ECU is not flashable it's just an EPROM to flash you need EEPROM.

Edited by rob82

check out liveedit, combined with a romulator you an mod and edit the maps for your stock ecu on the fly.

for people tuning with a eprom burner i sudgest some amtel 29c256 chips which are flash chips and are electronicly eraseable and drop in for the std 27c256 chips that are found in the stock ecu.

number of ways to do this but whatever you choose the outcome is up to how well its tuned.

the stock ecu is VERY capable and can do some impressive things, tune it right and it will treat you well every time.

thanks for the info carlh, the reason i was thinking of attempting this is that it is cheap for everybody to use, software (freeware :dry:) doesn't cost money, the only price would be the socket and chip, which isn't much, but when you start factoring in the romulators things start getting expensive as i haven't been able to find a cheapish (as in they're all around the $400 mark from what i've seen) one yet :\ anyway if anybody else can shed some more light on the topic i'd be most appreciative :)

I'm fairly sure fuel maps can't be adjusted at all from the consult interface like base timing. But for timing tuning, if you did a real time map trace through the consult and dynamicaly adjusted the base timing you could tune timing maps in real time.

For instance, say if you wanted an extra 2 degrees of ignition at a certain rpm and load point, the program would give the 'change base timing by +2 degrees' command while the map trace shows it was using that certain cell. As soon as it left that cell it'd take away the command or issue a different one to suit another cell.

I'm sure it could be done, I just don't really have the time and enthusiasm at the moment :laugh:

Sounds interesting but a bit of a hassle to save a few hundred bucks.'

I'd be mre interested in replacing main processor with a PIC chip, external RAM and flash which are incredibly flexible and easy to program.

Edited by Color_Of_Green

I havent read everyones posts but Badbiki makes a flash daughterboard with usb interface that does away with the need of emulators, but the price is quite large compared to a standard daughterboard so I dont see an advantage unless you plan on doing some tuning yourself.

Edited by midnight

i had looked into using the biki board for the rb20 ecu and even had one in my hands for a short bit but the biki board doesnt 'truly' support the 27c256 prom based ecus, it requires a jumper harness...

to my knowledge lucas (badbiki) hasnt completed the prom ecu stuff yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...