Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HI all

Well i had time today so i went ahead and fitted my new FLYEN FPR and well that was the easy art, no big deal there.

So i primed to lines, no leaks, BONUS.

Started the car, good, everything runs ok.

As the car ideled i turned the seting up to 40psi, and all still good, no leaks ext.

So went for a drive annnnnnndddd

NO BLODY GOOD MATE. The car simply runs out of puff.

So went home, all lines still good, ok what is going on. SO i ran the car, got the motor to 6000 rpm and the fule pressure drops off. NOw this was under no load, so not sure what is going on. Is it not suppose to insrease with boost pressure. I know it had no load, but hay.

So how do i fix this?

What pressure should i be running? and has anyone got one of these installed? ARE they any good or did i get ripped off?

Also, can somone post a pic of their installation, and maybe a DIY just to double check mine.

THANKS

HELPPPPPPPPP

post-27760-1156855593.jpg

Edited by WogsRus

it does go up and down, but it moves more then 4psi, it propably dropps of to about 30psi, not sure. I will install it again once i have more infor. For now the setup is all inplace, i just reinstalled the stock system, and swithed the lines over.

hi, yeah i still have the stock pump, but the weird thing is the car runs fine with stock FPR no probs, no splutters, starts fine ect.

I am not sure if the reg may be faulty, or what. The only other things is the way the new REG line connects to the fuel rail, it has a bolt on adaptor plate, with an O ring seal, but it seams ok.

One question. Near the fuel filter on the return side, there is some funny check valve or something, what does that do?

So can somone post some pics of their setup to compare my FPR setup.

Thanks.

PS. What psi do the stock pumps handel, and what flow?

Why did you fit the reg if there was nothing wrong with car before hand?

HI all

Well i had time today so i went ahead and fitted my new FLYEN FPR and well that was the easy art, no big deal there.

So i primed to lines, no leaks, BONUS.

Started the car, good, everything runs ok.

As the car ideled i turned the seting up to 40psi, and all still good, no leaks ext.

So went for a drive annnnnnndddd

NO BLODY GOOD MATE. The car simply runs out of puff.

So went home, all lines still good, ok what is going on. SO i ran the car, got the motor to 6000 rpm and the fule pressure drops off. NOw this was under no load, so not sure what is going on. Is it not suppose to insrease with boost pressure. I know it had no load, but hay.

So how do i fix this?

What pressure should i be running? and has anyone got one of these installed? ARE they any good or did i get ripped off?

Also, can somone post a pic of their installation, and maybe a DIY just to double check mine.

THANKS

HELPPPPPPPPP

well basically, i had about 4k worth of parts sitting on the floor of my garage for about 6 months, as i had no car then, just the parts.

Now i have the car, i am slowly puting things in.

I fitted the FPR as i am installing my SAFC II this week, and once the FMIC is on, i am going to run 12 psi. Seing as most skylines hit RR about then, i am going to trick the computer by leaning out the map on the SAFC II and then bumping the fuel pressure back up to make sure it still has correct flow.

I cheacked for vac leacs, and all seams ok, the fuel pressure decreases with vacume ect.

I am thinkg that maybe it's not a 1:1 FPR and hence once on boost it runs toooo ritch. Not sure.

Maybe i go and get a nismo one and bolt that up instead.

ONE MORE THING, does it matter if the reg is not horizontal but vertical, can that couse any problems. ie. the inlet is 90 down and the outlet is horizontal.

pressure valve?

which one, the tank bypas one. Well i think i might get a new pump anyway, but i don't understand why the stock reg at 38psi, runs fine, and not at 40 psi on the new reg.

Strainge.

ANy other ideas.

Has anyone found a simmilar problem before?

It shouldn't matter which way it is mounted - its simply a diaphragm with variable pressure applied to one side.

Free revving at 6k is unlikely to produce any boost, so the fuel pressure won't rise too far. And a constant free-revving 6k will still likely have a fair bit of vacuum happening in the plenum. So, again, the fuel pressure won't rise too far.

Really stupid question - you did connect manifold vacuum to the new FPR?

yes i connected the vacume in and yes it's a rising reg, as in the vacume line as boost comes in provides extra pressure for the injectors.

however not sure what the rate is 1:1 or 1:2 and so on. MYBE the rate is too high and flods the motos, like i said, it's fine to drive off boost, no problems AT all, drive round all day, aslong as there is no boost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...