Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have got my hands on the latest release from garrett.

i need a 25mm spacer between the turbo and the manifold,

and i need to fabricate a dump pipe but apart from that everything i had for the gt30 will plumb straight

in. I picked the .82 a/r so i will be very interesting to see the results.

here's a couple of pics. looks good

post-24852-1158053748.jpg

post-24852-1158053839.jpg

Edited by dangerman4
  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

sorry

i just checked and my bad.

8mm is the dump flange bolts.

the t3 base bolts are 10mm.

and yes once it is spaced away from the manifold there is heaps of room.

i will start taking some progress pics when i get home from work.

Is this the internally gated T3 housing that Garrett have been promising all year, and part of last?

What is the used unit beside it? It appears to have a Garrett logo on the compressor housing too.

And most importantly, can you post up the CHRA ID tag number too please?

I'm going to be interested in the progress pics.

cheers

Is this the internally gated T3 housing that Garrett have been promising all year, and part of last?

What is the used unit beside it? It appears to have a Garrett logo on the compressor housing too.

And most importantly, can you post up the CHRA ID tag number too please?

I'm going to be interested in the progress pics.

cheers

Yes very interesting , hope they are available in quantity !

Dale the CHRA number would be the same for any cartridge with the same comp/turbine so its the complete assembly or unit number you want . Something worth noting is the part number stamped on the side of the exhaust housings mounting flange in the second shot . This would almost certainly be the turbine housings part number .

What I want to know is can these housings be grafted onto the GT37R cartridges because they have the potential to be better than the GT3540R cartridge for the larger/est RB - just need a suitable exhaust housing .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
Awesome news!!!!

Out of curiosity.... :(

Do they have a .63 internal gate gt3540?

Hi all , I got to look at a couple of these this afternoon - yep .63 and .82AR ratio .

The Garrett part numbers for the housings themselves (according to the packaging) is 771300-5 for the .82 and 771300-6 for the .63 .

The waste gate flat valve looks to be the same size as the IW GT28 housings and there is room for a larger disc as well . Doing a "high flow" on this valve is common practise on souped up XR6T's so no reason why these could not be modified the same way . BUT - always that but - the greater the area of the disc the more area exhaust manifold gasses under pressure have to work on to try and force it open . I kid you not and don't laugh , I've seen people using what looked like old bed springs trying to keep this valve shut .

The rule is if you run high boost pressure do everything you can to have the exhaust manifold pressure down somewhere near inlet manifold pressure . You don't need massive exhaust manifold pressure to drive the turbine just sufficient gas velocity by thermal expansion .

Back to those housings , Brett at GCG has I think five of each AR size ATM so be quick if you need one soon . Had I been better organised I would have had some pics but no doubt they'll turn up .

Cheers Adrian .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yes, every CU on the bus is available via the Consult port, but whether the scanner you are using is capable of talking to the TCU, the ABS/TCS modules, etc etc, is what is at question here. Many of them are only for engine codes. So, if you have one of those, you won't know if the ABS is having a bitch.
    • That's now. R chassis Skylines come from a time when the tolerance in the ADRs was a bit more....slack. My car, on 235/35-17, which is damn near the exact same size as the original 205/55-16, is pretty much bang on correct indicated speed across the whole legal range. That's demonstrated with constant speed run over 5km, and GPS speed. It's just the luck of the draw. My particular speedo head has to be the thing that is "calibrated" that way, because everything else (the diff ratio, the gearbox and the speedo drive**) are all same same as most other Skylines. **OK, so the speedo drive is a Navara unit to drive the R32's cable, not the electronic unit than an R33/4 would normally have with teh same gear on it. Otherwise, I applaud your OCD tendencies, and I would do the same if I needed to.
    • Not too sure, I believe the Nissan consult port does everything? Also just filled up the reservoir to full and the light is still on. The float seems to move up and down fine.
    • The speedo's can be very conservative, when my Mazda NC MX5 speedo is showing 118kph, the GPS, and a calibrated radar.... cop mate.....hits me at around 110kph +/- 1 or 2 kph, and that is on a 215/45 17, stock tyres size is 205/45 17 as well, so weirdly conservative with stock tyre size When my Commodore speedo red 116kph GPS had me at 110kph on 255/40 17, so again conservative Google says manufacturers need to set the speedo from 4 to 10% slower than actual road speed.....for safety.....and compliance  After doing some offset and clearance measurements to see what can fit the NC on 17x8 +40, without guard rolling or rubbing anything at my current ride height, I've decided that when my tyres are toast, I'm going to fit 225/45 17 and see where that gets me IRT actual speed of my speedo and GPS/radar From the online calculator I should be still be doing around 5kph under an actual 110kph when the speedo is showing 110kph My ADHD requires that when I'm doing 110kph on the speedo, that the actual road speed is actually really close to that, and not alot slower And going from 205 to 225 still keeps the car within the %/mm allowable in the NSW vehicle rules and regulations, which is nice, as long as I'm looking at the latest version that is.....LOL https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf
    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
×
×
  • Create New...