Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi i've just been looking for a cold air intake kit for my r33 RB25DET as i want my car to sound really loud and nice when taking off. I've heard some pretty nice r33's when they take off, some sound like jets taking off and i was wondering if this kit would give me that sound?

Has anyone actually got this kit on their car and knows what it sounds like and if it gives good performance as well?

Is the difference noticable compared to just an apexi POD?

I think this one is for a 70mm AFM so does that mean it'll just bolt on to a stock AFM?

Edited by 4AL2NV
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134270-apexi-super-suction-kit/
Share on other sites

The stock AFM is 80mm Dia. for an R33 same as the Z32 AFM

I think the steel intake would give a better induction note, but thats not the main reason for using one, they are used so that the stock rubber intake pipe doesnt suck itself closed when running high boost or a larger turbo.

The stock AFM is 80mm Dia. for an R33 same as the Z32 AFM

I think the steel intake would give a better induction note, but thats not the main reason for using one, they are used so that the stock rubber intake pipe doesnt suck itself closed when running high boost or a larger turbo.

are you sure the z32 is the same dia as stock r33????????????????????

rb26 76mm

rb20 80mm

rb25 80mm

vg30 z32 80mm

vh41 q45 90mm

so if the z32 has the same diamiter tube(and im not saying it doesnt as i honestly dont know i was under the impression it was larger so would allow more airfow for the same voltage output) but still reads up to 5 volts same as stock r33gtst how does it allow more airfow for the same voltage output??... i hope i made sence as having them the same size doesnt make sence to me

it has different calibration to the rb20 and rb25 afms

so at 4.1v its flowing more air than an rb25 unit at 4.1volts

i think its around 1.5v offset ie an rb25 at 4.0v its about 3.0v on a z32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...