Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sorry for yet another hijack :laugh: , but is that autospeed fuel adjuster and boost controller thing as good as the pfc (when i comes to air/fuel tuning and boost controlling)? would this be recommended as my next mod since after installing and splitdump/front pipe im now running at slightly higher boost than normal.

hey lanky71, the first mod i did to my 34 was the FMIC and pod filter (yes i know its 2 intake mods but the 34 sedan is a sleeper kind of car, cops dont care too much where i am anyway :) ), then a split dump/front pipe and a custom catback system (including the cat, it came to about $650 - done by a local exhaust shop); and yes, i also got a bov and placed it in the 34 auto, bascailly i got sick of it after a few months and took it off ( its also a cop magnet) .

Edited by RyanN
yes, i also got a bov and placed it in the 34 auto, bascailly i got sick of it after a few months and took it off ( its also a cop magnet) .

Just a question... how'd it sound on an auto btw?

i reckon if u had to make the choice between a pod or a fmic, go the cooler. see what GTRgeoff has in his writeup on airboxes and get a good panel filter. My 2c

oh and geoff, that lock bar, good stuff mate. i love it! easy as to fit

the 34's came standard with the same bov as all the other rb20/25s, which is also the same as on a wrx (although the bolt holes are in different spots).

and the 1 intake mod doesn't apply in QLD either.

Hows it going mad? :O

the BOV was on the auto tranmission r34's as well? (i'm fairly new to nissan's)

I'll explain why i'm asking these questions (might not matter with newer cars, but i'll mention it anyway):

I had a mkIII supra previously (Ga70, 1G-GTE engine, Auto, used a MAF sensor not a MAP sensor like the 1JZ) and it did not have a stock BOV. I got a BOV put on next to the throttle body. I then added a cat back exhaust with HI Flow cat and a HKS superpower flow pod kit. Once that was done, did a dyno run and the car didnt perform as expected (almost worse acctually). Turns out the ECU could not cope with the now quicker and larger amount of air flying into the engine, and started flooding the engine with fuel (even had tiny droplets of fuel spluttering out the exhaust. A SAFC had to be installed to fix the problem and to make the most of the mods (got even more HP with the SAFC). After reading about it on the web, it seems that ECU cars without a stock BOV or with recirculation valve factor this in its air fuel calculations (is this true anyone?). Introducing a atmo BOV or POD kit threw these calculations out the window apparently. Again this problem plagued older ECUs, and i'm sure the r34's electronics are well advanced compared to a Ga70 supra, atleast i hope so *chuckle*.

Newer ECU or Not I'd still recommend get a SAFC when you start changing AF parts, purely to get the most of your mods.

Edited by Scratch

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...