Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So,

I'm looking for a race suit, for two applications, circuit (track days) & go karting.

I know that I don't need a suit for track days, but I need one for go karting, so if I can get one that suits both applications that would be sweet as.

Where should I be looking?

What sort of suits are there available?

Do I need a CAMS approved suit?

Cheers

Jase

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134535-race-suits/
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

For national you need at least 2 layer suit. Ive found my new sparco to be alot more comfortable then the old erg one i shared with my old man.

I think the stuff has got to be FIA approved.

My new sparco suit is upto FIA 2000 stds. Sparco Sprint series.

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134535-race-suits/#findComment-2581929
Share on other sites

NOTE: Please take this info with a pinch of salt. It is only my experience, and not a definative guide. I take no responsibility for others use of this information.

OK, Here is the info off the top of my head.

First and foremost, there are a few different types of suits.

Single layer - One outer Layer of fire proof material

Dual Layer - Two Layers of fire proof material, One outer, one inner

Triple Layer - Three layers of fire proof material, One outer, two inner.

Single layer is suitable for club events, upto and including motorkhanas, hillclimbs, sprints.

Dual Layer is suitable for anything in the National level of motorsport - Rallys, targa's and the above mentioned stuff - Not including things like V8 supercars.

Triple Layer required for any FIA stuff and international rally's.

There are two standards that are recognised by CAMS and FIA. And that is the 1986 FIA standard and the 2000 FIA standard.

Without this approval on the neck of the suit the suit cannot be used in the events of national and state level.

Apparently the 1986 standard is being phased out, but CAMS has not yet put a due by date, so you may find that most shops are selling these suits at reduced prices.

Next, Suit Material.

There is from what I see, Wool & Nomex.

Wool is a natural fibre and as such has some different properties to that of Nomex, which is a man made material. If you want to find out what they are......google it.

As for which is better, Nomex is more expensive, looks shineier (is that a word?) and feels nice (too me) on.

Wool is less expensive by almost about a third, looks more dull and can be (but not always) itchy on the skin.

For go-karting (racing) you need an abrasive resistant suit, which is made from a polymer like nylon. These suits CANNOT be used in car racing due to the non compliance with the fireproof material requirements.

So for my case a single layer suit will be suitable since I will not be racing go karts, only mucking around in them.

so, there it is.......

A very simple guide/layman explanation of race suits how what where.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134535-race-suits/#findComment-2588870
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...