Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This forum is great, and I know not all the clubs are up and running yet, but whats happening with the front page?

If anyone wants a hand at doing it.. let me know..

Ive done designs for,

www.speedworx.net

www.calaisturbo.com

www.exstatic.cjb.net

and heaps of others...

Give me a yell if any help is needed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1364-main-website/
Share on other sites

Hey Man, the sites only temporary... we just needed to get something up on the space... we will review it and get a new site up there once we have more content and a need for new stuff.

Thanks for the offer.

Christian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1364-main-website/#findComment-27427
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

PranK, dude, is the site EVER gonna be up? Sure we don't have much content.. but seriously, i could get a good site up within 1-2days.. it's taking forever, rightly so because you're busy, but theres plenty of content

- we've had a heap of cruises now, so we've got alot of pics and we can just do a short write up on each event

- we've got a heap of members - put an announcement on the forums about member bios

- organise this photoshoot (or i can, if u like) so our state members can have some more nice pics

- we've got plenty of events coming up to put up on the main page

- i can get some wallpapers done, make some screen savers and whatnot

and then let it grow from there, in which it will if we've at least got a decent page up!

what do you think?

ryan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1364-main-website/#findComment-39945
Share on other sites

i can go dig up all my sdu

how to threads and pics.

i think Prank sees the website as his baby as its his $$$ paying for it till the memberships are sorted.

theres nothing wrong with that i just think if we've got so many people wanting to help why don't we utilise them?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1364-main-website/#findComment-40717
Share on other sites

Skyzer, i agree.

Ryan, if you want to contribute, do a write-up of the cruises you have been to and the pictures and i will put them on the site and will give you full credit for it.

That goes to all of you, if you want something on the site - email me: [email protected]

i keep telling people to email me their car pics and i have only had a handful sent to me, i have 2 more to put up.

Christian.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1364-main-website/#findComment-42762
Share on other sites

Originally posted by PranK

i still dig euros... love em!!

if i dont get an R34 next year, i think i'll get a BMW 330ci... grrrrr.

Just whatever, piccys and a bit of a story will be great.

Prankster a 330CI,,,,,I gotta sit you down boy and have words....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1364-main-website/#findComment-43505
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...