Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its TYPE-M DOOOOOOOD, you have just set yourself up for some serious flamming, so Ill start it lol.

All r33s are type-m and you r refering to a series 2, they have different bonnet headlights and frontbar.

lol my bad..that's why ppl come over here to be educated rite ? =)

i guess i will take the flaming as part and parcel of being in the community

anywayz, thanks for ur last sentence...know i now wat to get for a Type-M front

thanks

chock

Edited by chock

R33S2 - I think he is referring to getting his S1 to look like a R33 S1 with the Mspec bumper and side skirts. Not a Series 2. I know ppl say all R33's are Type M but a lot of car dealers/importers refer to a Series 1 M-spec as the version that came with the sideskirts and different front bar from factory

The dealers would be wrong. I've been saying this for ages. People on the forumn have only started realising it after the r34 gtr Mspec came out.

There is no such thing as r33 gtst m spec. Jspec also calls it the wrong thing. It's Type-m.

It's just like do you call an integra R spec?

I was looking to do this on my r33 but i cant find a secondhand "M-Spec" (haha just to annoy Manwhore) front bar in good condition and reasonable price in WA. Carmate sells a replica on their website though. Pretty sure you dont have to change the headlights

so...the help guys?

lolz...u know the series where the front bar looks hell lot "Fiercer" than the current GTS-T S1...

was wondering if anyone did it..and whoever did it...how much ...

chock

Maybe this is what you meant?

This was the bar that came on my car when I bought it (non type m)

post-29425-1160220171.jpg

& this was a type m I put on my car

post-29425-1160220496.jpg

The bar cost me $150 from a guy I met on this forum & it cost me $350 to get it painted, probably only $200 without the two-tone paint.

The bar looks great & you can't tell the difference in colour where the bar meets with the guards.

Hope it helped :)

Ladies and Gentlemen...

we got a winner..thanks so much Yo-yo..

a pic says a thousand words..2 pics 2 thousands words =)

thanks..the price..is not too shabby too...so wif the front bar..there's space for an aftermarket intercooler and all?

chock

Ladies and Gentlemen...

we got a winner..thanks so much Yo-yo..

a pic says a thousand words..2 pics 2 thousands words =)

thanks..the price..is not too shabby too...so wif the front bar..there's space for an aftermarket intercooler and all?

chock

No worries mate,

I was planning on a front mount but now I'm not going to bother as I am trading up to an r34.

I've been told the type m bar needs to be slightly modified to fit a front mount. Apparently they need to cut out the middle part that holds the licence plate... but that's also where most of the bar is fitted to the front reo bar :whistling:

Maybe somebody on these forums has done it before & can shed some light on this.

Edited by Yo-Yo

just so you know, all turbo r33's are type m, except for some of the auto's. i had what is refered to as a non type m bar on my car, but according to FAST my car is a type m. i think it depends on whether the car has ever been in a crash. the non type m bar is actually the sedan front bar.

just so you know, all turbo r33's are type m, except for some of the auto's. i had what is refered to as a non type m bar on my car, but according to FAST my car is a type m. i think it depends on whether the car has ever been in a crash. the non type m bar is actually the sedan front bar.

Are you 100% sure that it is the sedan front bar? I dont think this is true. Then what about the side skirts and rear pods? And ive also seen pics from old Nissan advertisements of the coupes with this front bar. Also a number of websites claim that the R33 GTST came out with a number of bodykits, lights etc. Its just like how ppl reckon only 95 onwards came with drivers airbag, however mine is a 94 and has an airbag.

And Im NOT saying that all turbo r33's arent type m

drivers airbag was optional on pre 95 model r33s. as were sideskirts.

the r32's had differences between the type m and the standard gts-t such as leather gear boot and handrake cover, leather steering wheel and bigger brakes. all of these features are standard on all of the r33 gtst's.

the only other reason for the different front bars i have found was that there was an optional front bar for gtst's.

for a list of models go here http://imports.motortraders.net/imports/se...p;model=Skyline

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...