Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Fatz, Fatz, Fatz, you always covert what you internally yearn for.

In words that you will understand “Your hot for some man sausage you front bum!”

Ok now thats over, lets talk about the "Corsair Challange"

I think the sedan dropping its load all over the track ruiened what was going to be a level playing field.

Phil did a 1.46.14 to start off,

Steve did a 1.42.XX

Adam did a 1.40.1X

Oil spil

Paul did a 1.46.46

John did a 1.40.08

Phil did a 1.42.xx

Paul did a 1.39.87

John has the exact times.

The car survived and showed no signes of not being able to play again. With the entry money, john will be able to replace the clutch and get some mods ready ready for next round.

Well done everyone, and lets get ready to play next time!

I had the best fun in this Corsair. Almost as much fun as passing GTR's at the track. Waiting.........

Such a contrast for everyone and nice to know even if blows up or something disasterous goes wrong it does not cost anything, even for me as I have written it off and virtually owes me nothing accept fuel and maintenance, unless it gets major then off to the wreckers for scrap.

Official times from first in the car.

Phil 146.14

Steve 142.77

Adam 140.70 with an extra cheat lap after missing a gear and grabbing first was it over the bridge and nearly left gear box behind and as expected though a good drive.

Then a big oil down around most of th track from a sports sedan

Paul 146.90

John straight after 140.61

Later Phill improved to a 1 43 something and Paul after oil cleared a lot on track 139.87 yet to be confirmed by clerk of the coarse and out of the event. Then ran out of day and no one else had a chance for improvement of their time.

Rematch apples for apples next track day should be hilarious action again. I almost dragged the door handles on some corners and top fun.

Edited by Boosted Zed
  • 2 weeks later...



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...