Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeh im going either the gtss or gt2860 both make good power,and good response ive heard

Im thinkin of doin the same there Gunner i was sweatin on the GT_RS's but from what ive heard the 2871's might be the same laggy but good power from 4grand onwards

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi mate i have them on my gtr and it made 510hp at the wheels on 22psi and 345kw on 17psi at the wheels they come on boost around 3000rpm and make strong power all the way to 8000rpm they work great with the right set up i have all the dyno sheets if you need any more info drop me a line thanks Jason

Hi mate i have them on my gtr and it made 510hp at the wheels on 22psi and 345kw on 17psi at the wheels they come on boost around 3000rpm and make strong power all the way to 8000rpm they work great with the right set up i have all the dyno sheets if you need any more info drop me a line thanks Jason

what else have you got in your motor?? stand 2.6L? cams?? see 3000rpm is not too bad...care to share a bit more?? cheers

thanx guys, just i thought this thread was dead

coming on boost is what? = 1psi, 20psi?

Loaded up on a dyno on 4th or on the street?

There is no way your going to see anything decent before 4500rpm on a stock capacity RB26.

They are 400hp turbos, not 300hp GT-SS or that ballpark turbo

Again, is that loaded up in 4th on a dyno?

Or are you seeing this sorta thing with a roll-on in 3rd.

Its hard to gauge and compare the two as they are totally different to each other.

Not saying your results are false or whatever, just trying to get an accurate picture

frankxinyu - whats your use for the car?

as topic states, is anyone using twin Garrett GT2871s on their GTRs? if so, how laggy are they? and what kind of power are they putting out?

cheers guys

frankxinyu the garret Gt2871 are basically the HKS GTRS turbo and are quiet common on the rb26 but they have had mixed results. They do make more power than the 707160-5 gt2860r but not by much and the turbo responce loss i believe doesnt out power gain. The best results gained fromt the HKS GTRS/GT2871 have been on stoked rb27/28 or rb30. You find it hard to beat the garret Gt2860R 707160-5 or HKS 2530 for alround twin low mount turbos.

Pete

This is the -5s at only 17psi with basic tune as the injectors are 100% duty so by the time we fit bigger injectors and run 24PSI with a full tune i really cant see the point in looking past these turbos for a dual use car and the price it right. RB26 std stroke and head,260Poncams and single throttle kit on stock intake so the engines not wild,shows how good the turbos are.

Boost controller is now sorted so boost is now earlyer and flatter.

Again, is that loaded up in 4th on a dyno?

Or are you seeing this sorta thing with a roll-on in 3rd.

Its hard to gauge and compare the two as they are totally different to each other.

Not saying your results are false or whatever, just trying to get an accurate picture

frankxinyu - whats your use for the car?

i do wanna maintain the street drivability, but it will see some track days.

by talking to another owner who is running twin GTRS on his stock RB26, these turbos are way too laggy on the street....i think i am going to stick to GT2860s-5

This is the -5s at only 17psi with basic tune as the injectors are 100% duty so by the time we fit bigger injectors and run 24PSI with a full tune i really cant see the point in looking past these turbos for a dual use car and the price it right. RB26 std stroke and head,260Poncams and single throttle kit on stock intake so the engines not wild,shows how good the turbos are.

Boost controller is now sorted so boost is now earlyer and flatter.

thats awesome figure....

the thing is these 2860s are so cheap nowadays.. they are cheaper than the GTSS ones, yet still make more power.....

To a large degree the jump from a 60mm to a 71mm compressor is going to affect the boost threshold because you have essentially the same sized turbine and housing with the same exhaust gas velocity trying to spin them up .

Lots of people ask me what is the next step up from the bigger trim 60mm compressors ie 2530's 63T or the high tip height 60mm 62 trim from the GT28RS/2860RS . So next up in Garretts GT range is the 71mm wheels (GT 35 comp series) which my list shows three sizes .

1) 71mm 48T , 49.25 inducer diameter , 4.75 mm tip height .

2) 71mm 52T , 51.20 inducer diametre , 5.00 mm tip height .

3) 71mm 56T , 53.10 inducer diametre , 5.00 mm tip height .

The larger trim and exducer tip height wheels have greater pumping capacity but it comes at a price , moving more air for the same wheel rpm means they need extra power to drive them . If the extra shaft power is not available then we need more engine revs giving more exhaust gas velocity to power the turbine/s . Basically the big trim/tip height wheels with the same turbine force a slip loss effect of the exhaust gasses round the turbine blades . Its a lose lose lose situation because boost threshold goes up , exhaust restriction goes up , detonation threshold comes down - backpressure if you like forces exhaust gas reversal back into the chambers in the overlap phase so charge dilution and preheating as well as pumping losses . All biggies .

Note in (1) above that the 48 trim 71mm wheel has obviously a smaller inducer diametre size AND lower exducer tip height . This is the next incremental step up from the 60mm GT compressors and will generate a bit more airflow (maybe 3-4 lbs) but have the least negative side affects of the three 71mm compressors . I don't think I'd go past this stage if at all on a standard capacity RB26 because its already starting to turn laggy and getting a bit hot and restrictive on the turbine side if really pushed . Probably more to be had from porting and cams with less trade off . 2860's and 2530's seem to be the sweet spot and after that really need larger turbines to compliment the larger compressors . This then really pushes the boost threshold up and increased capacity is the only way to help bring it back down .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...